this post was submitted on 21 Jan 2026
762 points (98.4% liked)

World News

52363 readers
1994 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

California Gov. Gavin Newsom's office said the governor was denied entry into a venue at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, on Jan. 21, after being invited to speak at the event due to "pressure" from the Trump administration.

Newsom had been scheduled to speak with Fortune at the USA House, Davos, a privately organized event, at the World Economic Forum, which has been recognized by the U.S. government as the nation's headquarters in Davos.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] blitzen@lemmy.ca 38 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (16 children)

ITT, idealists once again letting perfect be the enemy of good.

It’s worked so well the past few elections.

[–] theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world 93 points 4 days ago

would only apply if Gavin Newsom was "good".

[–] Akh@lemmy.world 73 points 4 days ago (2 children)

He is not good, he even denied genocide in Gaza and protected billionaires

[–] 100_kg_90_de_belin@feddit.it 15 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

And had photo-ops while clearing homeless camps.

He's not Trump, but most of Trump's donors would neither mind nor care.

Don't forget all the transphobia too!

[–] rafoix@lemmy.zip 61 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (9 children)

The Democrats have had nothing but people like Newsom since the 1980s but you think that’s the best course of action? He was invited there because he would only talk about cultural grievances and not the economic ones that the wealthy are currently causing.

Nobody wants perfect. A neoliberal Democrat winning will just continue the kleptocracy while lying to us about it. Bill Clinton, Obama, Hillary Clinton, Joe Biden and Kamala Harris are controlled opposition.

Also, Ben Shapiro, the lying little shit ran circles around him on Newsom’s podcast. Made him seem like a weak bitch.

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 9 points 4 days ago

Before then tbh

[–] hector@lemmy.today 2 points 3 days ago

Plus Newsom had his chance in 2024, when we needed a winnable candidate and he decided it was better to let the country fall than be accused of stepping over a minority woman, nevermind the fact she was massively unpopular and running as the status quo while republicans ran as reform. That biden's presidency was a shit show, people wanted a change, and they didn't know better than to not vote for the republicans.

Seriously, it's not just he doesn't deserve it, that he would not be popular enough to end the fascist threat and restore the republic, it's that he won't be popular enough to win, not the least with republicans cheating every way they can. At most he will ask the courts to let him have the election and they will say no.

[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works -1 points 3 days ago

That's on the voters for not participating in primaries...

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Cruxifux@feddit.nl 43 points 4 days ago (17 children)

Stop saying that bullshit nonsense. He is not “good”. We don’t demand perfection, we demand that these people don’t be genocidal right wing fascist light.

I hate whatever pundit told you all to say “dont let perfect be the enemy of good.” It makes me feel like I’m talking to a bunch of programmed robots.

load more comments (17 replies)
[–] itistime@infosec.pub 27 points 4 days ago

He is a corpocrate. A shill for the wealthy. He represents the white moderates.

I have almost reached the regrettable conclusion that the Negro's great stumbling block in his stride toward freedom is not the White Citizen's Counciler or the Ku Klux Klanner, but the white moderate, who is more devoted to "order" than to justice; who prefers a negative peace which is the absence of tension to a positive peace which is the presence of justice; who constantly says: "I agree with you in the goal you seek, but I cannot agree with your methods of direct action"; who paternalistically believes he can set the timetable for another man's freedom; who lives by a mythical concept of time and who constantly advises the Negro to wait for a "more convenient season." Shallow understanding from people of good will is more frustrating than absolute misunderstanding from people of ill will. Lukewarm acceptance is much more bewildering than outright rejection.

MLK advocated for some pretty radical changes to our society. Not just racial equality. We need the white moderates to lose their investments, or they won’t really help. They have too much to lose, they think maybe tomorrow would be more opportune.

Same then, same now.

[–] one_step_behind@quokk.au 17 points 4 days ago (1 children)

This is exactly the time to be going after libs like Newsom. Move the party left before primaries.

[–] blitzen@lemmy.ca 7 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

I actually agree with you. But experience tells me we’re too principled and undisciplined to support any candidate after the primaries.

[–] one_step_behind@quokk.au 7 points 4 days ago

I agree with that. Both voters and politicians share the blame for Trump being in office. Democrats fail to run good candidates, but voters refuse to have their voices heard in primaries as well as thinking that doing a "protest vote" in generals is useful.

[–] FerretyFever0@fedia.io 19 points 4 days ago (5 children)

The options have been rather poor, let's all be honest here. This would work if we were talking about say, AOC. Newsom, however, is bad. Very bad.

Pritzker is fairly good.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Zorque@lemmy.world 11 points 4 days ago

I will support him as far as it supports positive movement. I will criticize him otherwise. Same with every neo-liberal before him, and will continue with every neo-liberal after him.

[–] CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works 5 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Fetterman/Gabbard 2028! Yes we can!!1!

[–] whitecollarcry@lemmy.world 9 points 4 days ago

why would you post such an ugly thing

[–] pixeltree@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

The fucker is a democrat trump.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works 4 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (3 children)

Idealists are letting perfect be the enemy of the good but I don't think that's why Democrats underperformed. Neither Clinton nor Biden/Harris were idealists of this sort (despite some stuff Harris said but didn't mean back in the 2020 primaries) and they didn't lose elections because of a lack of support from the idealists. So IMO while the idealists aren't helping, the very much non-idealistic institutions of the Democratic party which prioritize seniority within the party over electability are to blame.

[–] Zorque@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago

Considering how close both 2016 and 2024 were, don't be so sure.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip 2 points 3 days ago

Oh look someone else pushing and autocrat with a blue paint job instead of red, telling us to pre submit to an obviously terrible choice. Being better than the worst option doesn't make him by any means, good.

[–] stoly@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

It’s bizarre. People don’t learn to negotiate or accept half a load of bread when offered.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

It’s worked so well the past few elections.

The last few elections had historically unpopular, zero charisma candidates who all had policy positions so far right, they weren't just to the right of the dem voter base, they were to the right of the average American...

Acting like anyone more liberal than Ronald Reagan was the problem is actively harmful, be cause yelling out voters to shut up and vote blue no matter who won't actually solve anything.

And as we saw with Biden, at a certain point the absence of more harm isnt enough.

We need someone "progressive" enough to actually try and implement a solution.

Even the voting members of the DNC realized that a year ago...

load more comments (2 replies)