this post was submitted on 18 Apr 2025
317 points (99.1% liked)
Not The Onion
16008 readers
1377 users here now
Welcome
We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!
The Rules
Posts must be:
- Links to news stories from...
- ...credible sources, with...
- ...their original headlines, that...
- ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”
Please also avoid duplicates.
Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.
And that’s basically it!
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
It just doesn't make logical sense. The most "successful" social media accounts are always the shittiest. You'd think it would completely devalue what a "view" is worth, but I guess eyeballs are eyeballs. Then the whole click farm situation where you just buy engagement. A secondary market that just reminds you of the Ouroboro.
I think I'm missing something because somehow half of tech is funded by it.
You're not missing anything. You got it right. The entire funding model for tech is destined for a financial collapse that will make 2008 look like child's play.
https://www.fsgoriginals.com/books/subprime-attention-crisis
It’s great for pushing enraging content though. I feel like the content itself has gravely affected the collective psyche, and so have influencer endorsements (which companies pay big bucks for), even if the explicit ads have not.
Influencer endorsements can actually be even less effective than traditional ads, despite their outsized budgets.
https://sponsors.marketingscience.info/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/c_pub/2023/03/2023-03-20-A-comparison-of-Social-Media-Influencers%E2%80%99-KPIs-Patterns-Across-Platforms.pdf