this post was submitted on 12 Feb 2026
449 points (99.8% liked)

Technology

81078 readers
4199 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@hackingne.ws
449
Why are people disconnecting or destroying their Ring cameras? (www.usatoday.com)
submitted 5 hours ago by spaghettiwestern@sh.itjust.works to c/technology@lemmy.world
76 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

A Super Bowl ad for Ring security cameras boasting how the company can scan neighborhoods for missing dogs has prompted some customers to remove or even destroy their cameras.

Online, videos of people removing or destroying their Ring cameras have gone viral. One video posted by Seattle-based artist Maggie Butler shows her pulling off her porch-facing camera and flipping it the middle finger.

Butler explained that she originally bought the camera to protect against package thefts, but decided the pet-tracking system raised too many concerns about government access to data.

"They aren't just tracking lost dogs, they're tracking you and your neighbors," Butler said in the video that has more than 3.2 million views.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] dukemirage@lemmy.world 75 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

If your stupid gadget needs a separate proprietary app that demands internet access, anticipate that all data is shared for all kinds of shady business.

[–] spaghettiwestern@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Not always the case. Some cameras require a proprietary app for set up but can then be set to stream to a local server. Internet access can then be completely blocked with router settings.

[–] scrion@lemmy.world 5 points 2 hours ago (3 children)

Still, would you really want that? A half-baked device in your network, a device you suspect would constantly betray you, if given the chance?

I personally can't imagine getting used to that. I'd despise the device (and myself probably).

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 2 points 2 hours ago

It's pretty trivial to block devices from accessing the Internet.

[–] spaghettiwestern@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 hours ago

I have absolutely no problem using these kinds of devices.

I have an old phone and a generic Play account that I used for setup so the companies have nothing of consequence but my public IP address. Setup takes less than 15 minutes and after that all Internet access is completely blocked just like it would be if I unplugged my cable modem. There is no way for the cameras to override my router settings.

My smart TV is much more of a concern.

[–] Linktank@lemmy.today 1 points 2 hours ago

So, what security cameras would you use or are you just back seat driving without a good suggestion?