this post was submitted on 13 Feb 2026
668 points (99.3% liked)

World News

55217 readers
2460 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Kulyk legally entered the U.S. in late 2023 along with his wife, 38, and daughter, who’s now 5. The family was sponsored by U.S. citizens as part of the Uniting 4 Ukraine program, a humanitarian program set up in April 2022 to allow Ukrainians fleeing Russia’s war to live and work in the U.S. on “parole.”

Once the initial two-year parole period expires, entrants can file for re-parole to remain in the country longer. That’s exactly what Kulyk says he did. His wife and daughter’s applications were approved. But his remained pending.

He said he was putting groceries in his car on Jan. 1 when he was approached by three ICE agents.

“I explained to the ICE officers that the war was killing people, that my wife had a disability, that it was violence, terrorism which we had escaped from but one of them began to laugh,” Kulyk told The Daily Beast. “I asked why he was laughing and I was told that he was pro-Russian, wanted Russia to win the war.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 35 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Important to remember that ICE is and has always been a bipartisan enterprise, and in fact, go look up who first appointed Tom Homan.

[–] TronBronson@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

All the violations of liberty and building of the surveillance state have been bipartisan.

[–] FlyingCircus@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

The division is not liberal vs conservative, but rather capitalist vs worker.

[–] TronBronson@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Not really dude those workers are voting their rights away on behalf of the capitalist lmao

[–] TronBronson@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

This new brand of authoritarians are so far from capitalism anyway lol. We’ve got a kleptocracy like Russia. There is not capitalism here.

[–] FlyingCircus@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Capitalism is simply private ownership of the means of production. That's literally the only defining attribute. Theoretically capitalism works best with complete market freedom, but since that inevitably leads to monopoly, the most successful capitalist nations have always had a strong regulatory state to prevent the ruling class from destroying the world in their greed-fueled feeding frenzies.

[–] TronBronson@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yes, key characteristics include profit motive and competitive markets driving economic exchange. You and Milton Friedman bot acknowledge it needs strong regulatory guardrails and income redistribution to prevent the capitalists from taking over the government/world. Citizens united (2010). So back to my argument of 'no capitalist, kleptocracy'. We barely have a functioning government to enforce ownership and they are stealing everything they can. It's a kleptocracy. or as I like to call it 7 monopolies in a trench coat. trump just took 10% of Intel because he could. The capitalist is the government, the government is the capitalist, we no longer have competitive markets, people no longer work for profit they work to not starve. Capitalism is dead. Long live what ever this shit is.

[–] FlyingCircus@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Kleptocracy, as you call it, is literally just capitalism functioning as intended. Since the end of feudalism there has never been separation between capitalist and government, because they've always had control of the means of production, hence control over the economy, hence control over whoever the fuck they want. There have been some few times in history where workers were able to secure rights for themselves in exchange for not fully going revolution, but in between those times, capitalists have always tried to crawl back those rights and secure even more for themselves, and they do it legally, by owning the media and the politicians. This is basic political-economy theory stuff, not some Milton Friedman Neo-capitalist apologia bullshit. Literally none of his ideas have led to the betterment of societies, can't we just abandon Chicago school of economics already?

[–] TronBronson@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Nothing had gotten better since when now? Like nothing at all in humanity has improved since what year?

[–] FlyingCircus@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I did not say that nothing has improved, I said that none of Friedman's ideas have been the cause of improvement. In fact, many of them have been a great hindrance to the global betterment of humanity.

[–] TronBronson@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

So the prevailing economic theory of the world in the last 50 years has done nothing. Where have the improvements come from?

[–] TronBronson@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

It’s just a pretty sharp critique without offering a solution or representing the problem.

[–] TronBronson@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Global poverty, access to medicine, more free movement for people, global connections. Decline in regional conflicts, Idk I think the world has improved a lot of ways in the last 50 years. The USA may be in a serious decline right now, but the world is still pretty solid and will go on without us for better or worse.

[–] FlyingCircus@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

All of those progresses are despite neoliberalism, not because of it. Neoliberalism is great at one thing only - concentrating wealth in the hands of the already wealthy. If there was no resistance to neoliberalism, we'd already be living in dystopia instead of rapidly approaching it.

[–] TronBronson@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

I’d argue it’s far more localized dynamic and nuanced than that. Neoliberalism is a cop out for a dude that can’t point to policy and people. Remember everything we don’t like in America is woke; not neoliberal anymore. If you’re gonna just randomly straw man societies problems, please the preferred terminology is the woke did this!

[–] dan1101@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Yep it's been broken for years. As soon as they started enforcing a 100-mile border zone, I knew something was rotten. But what's been happening lately highlights that immigration needs fixed more than ever. Write or call your congressman tell them we need immigration reform now before more people die or have their lives ruined for no good reason. It seems like congres needs to be told what to do by enough of their voters or they do nothing. The main thing they're worried about above all else is getting reelected.