this post was submitted on 10 Mar 2026
683 points (98.6% liked)

Technology

82549 readers
3574 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

YouTube viewers will soon have to sit through even longer ads, with Google rolling out new 30-second unskippable spots on a popular app.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Vince@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Yeah this sucks, but do they have any alternatives? How else do they make money? Or is everyone mad because the amount of ads they show is disproportionate to the amount of ads they need to show?

[–] Postmortal_Pop@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago (2 children)

They have a literal monopoly on the service and the analytical data the sell makes more money then advertising ever could.

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 3 points 2 days ago

Analytical data they sell to a very authoritarian government that verges on totalitarian.

[–] Vince@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

I don't doubt that they sell data, but it would have to be monumental to actually fund all their hosting needs.

[–] witness_me@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago

YouTube made more money than Disney in 2925. Tell me why unskippable ads are justified.

[–] paraphrand@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

No one here wants to talk about the realities of running such a massive video hosting operation.

No one is a serious competitor due to how large of a mountain it is to climb to compete. With every minute that goes by, YouTube becomes even more massive.

[–] Skankhunt420@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I feel like a decade or two (damn) ago now DailyMotion really had a chance man even Vimeo there for a min but then its like they just gave up fr.

It was kind if interesting to see people using Pornbub there for a min and it would have been cool for them to try and lean into that more with like a sfw variant of some sort (called something different) because they are probably one of the only companies that have the ability to do it honestly and even then, idk if they could really do it like YouTube does.

YouTube is the one single thing I haven't de googled myself from.

[–] paraphrand@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

I’m so bummed that Vimeo went the way it did.

[–] wordmark@mas.to 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

@Skankhunt420 @paraphrand we need to build alternatives. have ideas. who is in?

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 days ago

There are plenty of alternatives right now. Why not use them?