this post was submitted on 24 Apr 2025
47 points (100.0% liked)

Australia

4128 readers
54 users here now

A place to discuss Australia and important Australian issues.

Before you post:

If you're posting anything related to:

If you're posting Australian News (not opinion or discussion pieces) post it to Australian News

Rules

This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone. In addition to those rules:

Banner Photo

Congratulations to @Tau@aussie.zone who had the most upvoted submission to our banner photo competition

Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

Moderation

Since Kbin doesn't show Lemmy Moderators, I'll list them here. Also note that Kbin does not distinguish moderator comments.

Additionally, we have our instance admins: @lodion@aussie.zone and @Nath@aussie.zone

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

🤣 Literally bumpkins

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] UnbrokenTaco@lemm.ee 8 points 16 hours ago (3 children)

The article and title have been updated.

Council votes again to dump public EV fast charging station – then changes its mind

I think it's saying that they'll go ahead with the chargers now. In having trouble parsing the edits to be honest

[–] Fallstar@mander.xyz 3 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

All I could see was this

This article has been updated to correct an error that the Livingstone shire council refused to rescind the decision to pause all EV charger installations on the Capricorn coast.

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 4 points 10 hours ago

Yesterday's ABC article is a bit clearer that the latest news is the charger is going ahead.

[–] UnbrokenTaco@lemm.ee 3 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

Yeah, it's really confusingly worded

Last week the Livingstone Shire council voted to cancel a deal to install the Capricorn Coast’s first EV charger, and a followup meeting held on Thursday to reverse the decision initially failed to win over the required number of four councillors.

But a surprise second motion from the mayor reversing last week’s decision while also asking state and national local government associations to investigate renewables, got up.

So my read of it is:

  1. Cancel project
  2. Try to undo cancellation but fail
  3. Try and succeed to undo cancellation

But I'm not that confident in my comprehension of it