this post was submitted on 15 Mar 2026
653 points (99.5% liked)

World News

54755 readers
3081 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

UK and Japan among countries that are considering options but yet to commit warships to blockaded shipping route

Countries including the UK, Japan, China and South Korea have said they are still considering their options but without making commitments after the US president, Donald Trump, urged them to send warships to the strait of Hormuz to secure the vital shipping route.

The effective closure of the strait of Hormuz by Tehran, in retaliation for airstrikes by the US and Israel, has proved catastrophic for global energy and trade flows, causing the largest oil supply disruption in history and soaring global oil prices.

However, the international response to Trump’s call for the dispatch of warships has so far proved vague and reluctant, with countries unwilling to commit to a military response that could prove treacherous for their navies.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Paragone@piefed.social 69 points 1 day ago (6 children)

NO country should side with Trump unless Trump is open to negotiated-ceasefire/settlement.

Otherwise, they're just backing baldfaced imperialism.

& the minute that Trump decides that negotiated isn't on the table anymore?

Withdraw support.

Principles are what no political-gov't can have the spine to have, though.

_ /\ _

[–] Thedogdrinkscoffee@lemmy.ca 81 points 1 day ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (1 children)

I have to respectfully disagree. There is no such thing as "negotiation" with Trump and his admin. Serial bad faith actors with no checks and balances from courts or congress. They have no rule of law. It's a tin pot dictatorship where no deals are ever honoured.

It is pointless to engage at any level. They act and react, everyone else acts and reacts. That's it. When Trump is dead, the same rules apply because the courts and congress are still populated with the same people that enabled him.

We can save a lot of time and money and just eject US embassies worldwide for at least the next 20 years. US Diplomacy is dead.

[–] prex@aussie.zone 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

US Diplomacy is dead.

Its not dead, its just resting

[–] DarkDarkHouse@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 19 hours ago

He blew it with the Norwegians over the peace prize.

[–] CIA_chatbot@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago

NO country should side with Trump. Doesn’t need to be more reason.

[–] snooggums@piefed.world 15 points 1 day ago

Nobody should trust anything Trump says he will do, much less anything he would be 'open to'.

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

the us just constantly violates ceasefires and agreements anyway, and have been like this for many decades.

it makes no sense to make a deal with them expecting anything other than buying time until they are inevitably backstabbed.

iran itself refrained from nukes with the agreement that it would be left alone by the empire lmao

[–] nymnympseudonym@piefed.social 13 points 1 day ago

Ummm... no country should do this unless they have super effective defenses against USV (naval drones)

afaik, no country on this planet has that ability.

[–] Gladaed@feddit.org 2 points 1 day ago

The price of energy means that some countries are very much incentivised to do that. Iran is targeting them by intercepting/blocking shipments.

Does just mean that it's much more complicated than being a clear no.