this post was submitted on 04 Apr 2026
1111 points (92.2% liked)

Leopards Ate My Face

9670 readers
1836 users here now

Rules:

  1. The mods are fallible; if you've been banned or had a post/comment removed, please appeal.
  2. Off-topic posts will be removed. If you don't know what "Leopards ate my Face" is, try reading this post.
  3. If the reason your post meets Rule 1 isn't in the source, you must add a source in the post body (not the comments) to explain this.
  4. Posts should use high-quality sources, and posts about an article should have the same headline as that article. You may edit your post if the source changes the headline. For a rough idea, check out this list.
  5. For accessibility reasons, an image of text must either have alt text or a transcription in the post body.
  6. Reposts within 1 year or the Top 100 of all time are subject to removal.
  7. This is not exclusively a US politics community. You're encouraged to post stories about anyone from any place in the world at any point in history as long as you meet the other rules.
  8. All Lemmy.World Terms of Service apply.

Also feel free to check out:

Icon credit C. Brück on Wikimedia Commons.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] femtek@lemmy.blahaj.zone 47 points 1 day ago (5 children)

I voted for her but if they put Gavin newsom, I don't know if I can care anymore.

[–] Grail@multiverse.soulism.net 37 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I hate that guy, but hate cannot make Me act against My own interests. Well it can a little bit, especially in fast moving situations. But it can't do it with big decisions like My vote.

[–] femtek@lemmy.blahaj.zone 16 points 1 day ago (7 children)

Yea, but from all his talks and bills I don't trust him to not be against queer people. So in a way they both will be against my own interests.

[–] gibmiser@lemmy.world 29 points 1 day ago

He will be more against queer people than whoever the Republicans put forth? Really?

If candidate A wants you to hide your queerness and use the wrong bathroom, and candidate B wants to force you to be straight or go to jail or a conversion camp, are you really going to throw your hands up in the air and say it's not worth voting?

Voting for someone does not mean you support everything they stand for. It just means you think they are the best option of what has been laid before you.

[–] Grail@multiverse.soulism.net 17 points 1 day ago

My actions and his actions are two very different things. If he primaries, I may tell people to vote for him against the R, having told people to vote against him in the primaries. In both cases I would be acting in alignment with My interests, for they are two very different choices. I will hope for the best and plan for the worst.

[–] Ooops@feddit.org 14 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

"Option A is really, really bad for me. But I'm not sure if option B wouldn't be somewhat bad, too. So I will just watch and let option A happen."


You, and millions of other propaganda victims helping fascists win

[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm getting pretty tired of voting for the 'slightly less bad' blue fascists, though.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world -2 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

No one’s arguing voting Dem is a magical cure-all. Your local Dem will not be 100% aligned with your worldview (unless it’s you in office).

But 65% is more than -200%. A shit-ton of so-called “lefties” cannot do basic math.

[–] femtek@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

The 65% brings us further right so the Republicans can be more evil.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 2 points 23 hours ago

Does it.

No. Stop being wrong.

[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 3 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (1 children)

But 65% is more than -200%.

Nah, it's more like "-40% is more than -200%"

Still headed toward fascism and abuse ... just a bit slower.

We're in a car heading toward a cliff, and we have a choice of whether to hit the gas or the brakes. But the brakes are really shitty and can only slow us down slightly -- no way they'll stop in time.

[–] Zexks@lemmy.world 2 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

So instead we hit the gas or do nothing...really?

[–] NauticalNoodle@lemmy.ml 2 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

They should steer left -towards ice cream.

[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 0 points 15 hours ago

Well, my plan is to jump out of the car (leave the country). But what you do is up to you.

[–] KingOfTheCouch@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Your courage to do anything will help in the long run.

Please at least consider the option that helps some others.

[–] daychilde@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

It's not even that. EVERYONE is harmed by fascists. Or, if you'd like to rephrase it this way: EVERYONE is harmed much more by fascists. Either way, in the general, vote blue. In the primaries, vote for the best option. And if you can run for office, run for office.

[–] daychilde@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Single issue voting is how fascists win.

[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social -3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Voting is how fascists win.

This won't be fixed by voting. It never could have been and it never will be.

[–] daychilde@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Voting is how fascists win.

I'm just quoting the stupidest thing I've read this week for posterity.

[–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml -1 points 12 hours ago

Peak BlueMAGA voter outreach

[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] daychilde@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Well, I don't know here, let's fucking use a brain cell or two.

Arguably, sure, facists win because people vote for them.

And do you know how facists lose? PEOPLE VOTE FOR NOT-FASCISTS.

So what you said was true and also the most useless fucking worthless statement I've read all week.

After all, the entire fucking point here is STOP VOTING FOR FASCISTS.

[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 4 points 22 hours ago

And do you know how facists lose? PEOPLE VOTE FOR NOT-FASCISTS.

Historically speaking, when have fascists ever been voted out of power?

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 1 points 23 hours ago

Username checks out.

[–] krashmo@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

He's against all people who aren't Gavin Newsom. He's clearly a snake

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world -3 points 23 hours ago

People said that about Harris too. You see how that’s going, yes?

[–] scintilla@crust.piefed.social 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I don't think people arguing against you get newsom he fundamentally has no real beliefs and will just do things to get more power. He throws the dem base under the bus at every opportunity and is somehow more pro billionaire that the average corp dem.

[–] femtek@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 day ago

Yeah, I would rather have pritsker, at least he seems to have a backbone among the Democrat governors. I also think having conservative Democrats brings us further right so more evil Republicans can get in power.

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.world 20 points 1 day ago (3 children)

If it was a race between Gavin Newsom and JD Vance I’d vote Newsom in an instant.

[–] jontree255@lemmy.world 28 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

I agree but it’s like asking “where would you like to be stabbed?”

For any Democrat trying to “move to the center” I’d like to point towards Labour in UK and ask them how that’s going.

Thankfully 2028 is a political lifetime away and Newsom might not even be relevant.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 1 points 23 hours ago

Labour UK has been kind of astounding to watch. They started strong then somewhere around six months in it started to get wonky. And now it’s like some sort of Labourexit. Bizarre. But I guess that's why the Greens are growing.

[–] PoopingCough@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's not going to be JD. Mark my words, save my comment, it's going to be Tucker Carlson. And if that happens and Dems haven't changed their tune we are absolutely fucked.

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.world -3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

If that happens and leftists are still their own biggest enemies with their pursuit of an ideologically pure candidate that doesn’t exist we’ll be fucked.

[–] PoopingCough@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I don't think most leftists are looking for an ideologically pure candidate, they're looking for someone who will actually represent the people. The Israel issue is a great example of this disconnect; amongst Dem voters 90% are against supporting Israel, and yet there's only a handful of Democrat politicians who have are agaimst sending Israel military aid. It's really not a high bar for candidates to clear, and yet establishment Dems just keep SPRINTING to the right.

Leftists arent their own enemies, their enemies are neoliberals.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 3 points 23 hours ago

Just like last time

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world -2 points 23 hours ago

That’s because yOu LoVe tEh GeNoSiiiiiDe!!11!

I, however, am SO much smarter and better than you. I choose to let trump win.

. . . Wait how was this supposed to work again?

[–] Peasley@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago

Gavin running for president might flip California red lol. He is hated here across the political spectrum.

[–] kittenzrulz123@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 23 hours ago

If Gavin Newsom is the dem candidate I will not be able to stomach voting for him, im a trans person and I refuse to vote for someone who would actively backstab me