this post was submitted on 27 Apr 2025
528 points (96.8% liked)

World News

46188 readers
3287 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Women who transitioned decades ago feel their safety and security has suddenly been removed

Last week’s supreme court ruling sent shock waves through the UK’s trans community.

The unanimous judgment said the legal definition of a woman in the Equality Act 2010 did not include transgender women who hold gender recognition certificates (GRCs).

That feeling was compounded when Kishwer Falkner, the chair of the Equality and Human Rights Commission, which is preparing new statutory guidance, said the judgment meant only biological women could use single-sex changing rooms and toilets.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] garbagebagel@lemmy.world 33 points 2 days ago (7 children)

She donated £70,000 to the people that pushed to pass this bill.

In the words of Pedro Pascal, she is indeed a "heinous loser"

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 18 points 2 days ago (6 children)

Her public celebration of the result was absolutely grotesque

Screenshot of a Tweet by Rowling, replying to another Tweet by Rowling. The original Tweet has a photo of her smoking a cigar and holding a drink, sitting by the sea and staring smuggly at the camera, with the caption "I love it when a plan comes together". The reply Tweet compares people mistaking her cigar for a blunt to trans women, claiming the cigar might "identify as a blunt".

[–] Jumpingspiderman@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Anyone speculate on why JKR is so anti-trans? Did something happen in her past that makes her so hateful on this issue?

[–] burgerpocalyse@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

radical feminist to trans exclusionary radical feminist pipeline, being completely isolated from other people due to being a billionaire, not respected by other authors due to not being very good at being an author, also potential black mold poisoning

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)