this post was submitted on 13 Apr 2026
542 points (98.2% liked)
Not The Onion
21227 readers
2108 users here now
Welcome
We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!
The Rules
Posts must be:
- Links to news stories from...
- ...credible sources, with...
- ...their original headlines, that...
- ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”
Please also avoid duplicates.
Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, ableist, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.
And that’s basically it!
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Controversial take: why do you want to police other people’s sex life. That’s creepy and weird.
I don't.
You just announced your plan for regulating other people's sex lives bruh
My sibling before christ. I wrote a comment leading with a controversial take and then explained my concerns. This does not police anyone. Or want to police. There is more to reality than just Saying you do you on all issues for you are free. Sometimes a conversation can be had.
You just said you're in favor of regulating people's sex lives, again.
It'll be easier to have a good faith conversation with people if you're not contradicting yourself.
People's sex lives are already regulated. And some part of the regulation may be good. This is not a gay sex = bad kind of regulation. I feel like you are not engaging in good faith by blocking any and all conversation.
You were asked "why do you want to police people's sex lives, you said "I don't", and every time you respond you're talking about how you want it done.
I don't think it should have been legal for that priest to rape me, probably we agree on that. I am in favor of policing people's sex lives, obviously far less than you, but I can own it.
I don't want them policed, I want the step kink to be less pushed and a more representative and inclusive porn industry.
That's not policing their sex lives as they can still opt in. That's what annoys me about your phrasing. That phrasing sounds like you are accusing me of being in favor of banning gay sex. This is what policing sex lives has historically been.