this post was submitted on 29 Apr 2025
-16 points (35.7% liked)

No Stupid Questions

40403 readers
429 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here. This includes using AI responses and summaries.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I’ve been reading up on the tariffs that were imposed during the Trump administration and I keep seeing mixed reviews about their effectiveness. On one hand, they seemed to protect certain domestic industries by making imported goods more expensive; on the other hand, there’s a lot of talk about higher prices for consumers and retaliatory measures from trading partners.

The thing is, these tariffs aren’t exactly popular among everyone. If we were to look back 1 year out, 2 years out, and even a few more years down the line, how will we actually know if this was a good move?

Surely there are some metrics or outcomes that can help us evaluate their success or failure. I guess it's not as simple as checking stock market performance alone, although that’s probably part of it, right?

Is it primarily about looking at changes in trade balances with countries like China, or do we need to consider the broader economic impacts, such as job growth within certain industries? And how much weight should be given to the political ramifications, like strengthened relationships (or tensions) with trading partners?

I’d love to hear your thoughts on what metrics or indicators would help determine whether these tariffs were indeed a beneficial strategy. Thanks in advance for any insights!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jeffw@lemmy.world 11 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

I’ll take a stab at a “serious” answer, although be cautioned that this thinking is irrational.

If they worked, we would see manufacturers almost instantly beginning construction on US factories, opening new ones and reopening shuttered plants. We would see trade “balance” in terms of imports and exports with every trading partner we have.

[–] yarr@feddit.nl 2 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

If they worked, we would see manufacturers almost instantly beginning construction on US factories, opening new ones and reopening shuttered plants.

I think the almost instantly is the problem there for me. If I was someone that could afford to build a factory, I know that it would take a couple of years to come up to speed. I also know that if the tariffs disappear, that my money is gone. It won't work under "normal" conditions. So, I'll want some assurance these will be in place for a while. Since no one will make that assurance, or at least someone who would would be lying, I wouldn't feel confident enough to build anything.

I assume anyone with enough money to build a factory would think about some variation of that above. I think for that reason, no serious numbers of factories will get built. And, if none get built... what are we doing?

[–] bradorsomething@ttrpg.network 3 points 13 hours ago

I have two smaller businesses, and I’ve both laid off due to expected decrease in business and bought supplies ahead due to expected shortages.

You’re good putting together that you wouldn’t build a factory right now because uncertainty doesn’t let you predict returns. Not only can you not predict the next president and their tariff policy, I wouldn’t say you can predict trump’s actions tomorrow. I heard an interview John Bolton did today, and he said something along the lines that “trump doesn’t think, he reacts.” Tariffs could be zero or 500% next month or next year or tomorrow. The safe move is to wait and see - and while everyone waits and sees, only small-scale production will start, definitely not enough to sustain demand.

Honestly, if I had the money to build a factory right now, I’d park it and wait to buy one from a company that fails in all this. It would save so much money.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 3 points 19 hours ago (3 children)

why? it costs millions of dollars to construct new factories. Maybe billions, depending on the industry. It takes 7+ years to bring a new factory online. more to get all the kinks worked out and at full production.

Trump is supposed to be in office for only 4 years, at best, after which his tariffs will go away. it would be easier to simply just not ship to the US. which is how trade partners responded to the Hawley-Smoot Act in 1930, and which made the Great Depression that much harder to get out of.

[–] xavier666@lemm.ee 1 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

It takes 7+ years to bring a new factory online. more to get all the kinks worked out and at full production

Not to take away from your point but they also have to

  • make sure product is at par with the previous alternative in terms of quality
  • make sure your supply chain is willing to shift to your new product
  • have a healthy supply of workers OR
  • have good automation in their production line (automation supply should also be sourced from within the country)

Once you have created this factory (which needs to be subsidized by the government in order to compete with the foreign product), we then apply targeted tariffs so that people can slowly shift to the homegrown product. Doing all this can takes decades of careful planning.

Tariff is not an ON/OFF switch which Trump thinks

[–] yarr@feddit.nl 1 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Trump is supposed to be in office for only 4 years, at best, after which his tariffs will go away. it would be easier to simply just not ship to the US. which is how trade partners responded to the Hawley-Smoot Act in 1930, and which made the Great Depression that much harder to get out of.

Yes, I think this is very wise. So, unless we are just saying "well, I guess this 3.7 years is a loss now..." that's the end.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago

that's jut it, though.

They're not saying the 4 years is a loss. the producers outside of the US.... they're just going to ship to new markets, and when things get less insane, then they come back. that's all they need to do. Spinning up production in the US is expensive, costly, and it'll take more time to complete than the whole reason for it will last- presumably.

and if it lasts longer than four years, that's probably going to be even worse, because then, well, yeah. the best case scenario is you get to write off all those losses. Worst case? it can get whole hell of a lot uglier as you lose IP and find yourself competing against your own designs.'

So trump's tariffs is driving imports away and killing local development of production at the same time.

to put it in the simplest terms, it's fucking stupid.

[–] nous@programming.dev 3 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Trump is supposed to be in office for only 4 years, at best,

That assumes America is still a democracy in 4 years. We are only a few months in and it is already not looking great.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 3 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

and you think that's an argument to spin up new factories? not really.

If the US collapses into complete fascism, everyone inside is either going to be cut off from the global market. for a foreign company, spinning up factories in the US, when, in four years, they might literally get those investments yeeted from them is stupid. and that's really the best case.

[–] nous@programming.dev 1 points 8 hours ago

I never argued that. Only pointing out its decent into fascism. All bets are off at that point as to what will happen to its industries.