this post was submitted on 24 Apr 2026
171 points (95.2% liked)

World News

55677 readers
2504 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Ukraine’s defence ministry has fired a top commander after photos emerged of a group of emaciated soldiers who have been left on the frontline for months without proper food and water.

The scandal erupted after the wife of one of the soldiers, Anastasiia Silchuk, posted the images on social media. The four men appeared to be pale and visibly malnourished, with prominent ribcages and thin arms.

The soldiers had spent eight months defending a shrinking bulge of territory on the left bank of the Oskil River, near the north-eastern Ukrainian city of Kupiansk, their relatives said. Supplies of food and medicines could only be flown in by drone.

“When the lads arrived at the frontlines, they weighed over 80–90kg. But now they weigh around 50kg,” Silchuk posted. After one delivery, she said, no more food turned up for 10 days. The soldiers were forced to drink rainwater and melt snow to survive.

“The longest they went without food was 17 days. They weren’t listened to on the radio, or perhaps no one wanted to listen to them. My husband shouted and begged, saying there was no food and water,” she said, adding that the problem was bigger than just one case.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TheLunatickle@lemmy.zip 49 points 8 hours ago (3 children)

Now that Hungary is finally free from putins cock puppet and the EU loan is released, hopefully this sort of situation can be avoided.

[–] anticurrent@sh.itjust.works 1 points 50 minutes ago

This is not a problem of funds. It's been a choice made by the higher ups in the Ukrainian military. there have been countless times where it became evident that Ukrainian soldiers are being surrounded and the choices were either to retract them. or keep them in their position without food or ammunition until they get annihilated. And they choice was always to let them be encircled and let them fight to the last one. It's been seen in Avdivka and many other cities

[–] orioler25@lemmy.world 13 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

I'm not super well versed on all of this in Ukraine, is there a reason this suggests that this was unavoidable before?

[–] einkorn@feddit.org 7 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (2 children)

It waswas definitely avoidable but the situation for many soldiers in forward positions is tense at the best of times.

I am no expert on this but I believe the additional funds will not improve the situation for the grunts in the trenches significantly because the issue is not a lack of materials. Instead it's the ubiquity of cheap kamikaze and spotter drones that makes logistics so difficult because any sizeable movement attracts an immediate response.

I think instead the funds will to a significant portion be spent on purchasing material that are actually in short supply like missile interceptors to bolster defense against Russian air threats beyond drones.

[–] Mr_WorldlyWiseman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 14 minutes ago

Are the investments for long term drone improvements coming from Ukraine's budget or NATO procurement?

[–] orioler25@lemmy.world 7 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Right, do you have any sources on that I can check out?

[–] einkorn@feddit.org 6 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

My main source of information on the Ukraine conflict is Perun, an Aussie working in or at least adjacent to the military industrial complex. He has a playlist of presentations (he basically delivers narrated PowerPoint presentations instead of "traditional" videos) on Ukraine.

[–] orioler25@lemmy.world 6 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

I see, checked them out a bit. Kind of frustrating that it appears as though this is just someone who has worked in defense contracting and the sources they list are just typically news sites (which indicates to me they don't have access to or do not use whatever scholarly access they would have if they have a degree related to this). So, they seem like more of a reporter who is aggregating news coverage with some public documentation.

I'm sure their videos can be informative, but I'm more curious about how this is argued and measured as many experts in these fields are pretty incapable of articulating how systemic, material, and social conditions facilitate instances like this and how reflective they are of individuals' decisions or systemic dysfunction.

[–] einkorn@feddit.org 3 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Perun approaches the topic from an economical and strategic viewpoint. And yes, he uses mostly open source information because it would be very unwise for his career to use any form of insider information he might possess. Though if you have a look around the channel you can also find some interviews with experts in specific fields. And also yes, if you are more interested in the day-to-day situation on the ground I'd recommend checking out other channels as well. It's his stated goal to provide a top down view.

[–] orioler25@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

Oh, what I was talking about would still be a top down analysis, just one that is more informed and nuanced to create better explanations. Economic and political lenses exclusively tend to be distortive and only useful for people who subscribe to their preexisting explanations for things (and it doesn't seem like this person is qualified to produce those beyond their individual experiences).

[–] einkorn@feddit.org 2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

While we could start a whole philosophical debate about whether or not anyone can provide anything but their individual experience of things, I doubt someone unqualified would have been invited as observer to NATO wargames.

[–] orioler25@lemmy.world 1 points 31 minutes ago

We couldn't, because this is an internet comment thread and you don't seem to understand how these topics intersect. Also, yes, someone who is invited to some NATO workshop is not likely to be qualified to answer my questions by merit of it being a workshop for experts in the exact thing I am saying is not sufficient to.