this post was submitted on 30 Apr 2025
447 points (92.1% liked)

World News

46216 readers
2602 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

To this day, she remembers the racing thoughts, the instant nausea, the hairs prickling up on her legs, the sweaty palms. She had shared a photograph of herself in her underwear with a boy she trusted and, very soon, it had been sent around the school and across her small home town, Aberystwyth, Wales. She became a local celebrity for all the wrong reasons. Younger kids would approach her laughing and ask for a hug. Members of the men’s football team saw it – and one showed someone who knew Davies’s nan, so that’s how her family found out.

Her book, No One Wants to See Your D*ck, takes a deep dive into the negatives. It covers Davies’s experiences in the digital world – that includes cyberflashing such as all those unsolicited dick pics – as well as the widespread use of her images on pornography sites, escort services, dating apps, sex chats (“Ready for Rape? Role play now!” with her picture alongside it). However, the book also shines a light on the dark online men’s spaces, what they’re saying, the “games” they’re playing. “I wanted to show the reality of what men are doing,” says Davies. “People will say: ‘It’s not all men’ and no, it isn’t, but it also isn’t a small number of weirdos on the dark web in their mum’s basements. These are forums with millions of members on mainstream sites such as Reddit, Discord and 4chan. These are men writing about their wives, their mums, their mate’s daughter, exchanging images, sharing women’s names, socials and contact details, and no one – not one man – is calling them out. They’re patting each other on the back.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Scranulum@lemm.ee 3 points 23 hours ago (12 children)

Misandry is when someone says men who believe women shouldn't be allowed to vote are abusive.

Thank you for that elevated, nuanced take, king.

[–] rah@feddit.uk -2 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (11 children)

Misandry is when someone says men who believe women shouldn't be allowed to vote are abusive.

That's not what I said. I said there's a difference between being an asshole and being abusive and if OP can't see and acknowledge that difference then they're engaging in misandry. I didn't say anything about voting rights and misandry. Please don't put words in my mouth or misrepresent what I say.

[–] LandedGentry@lemmy.zip 2 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (10 children)

That’s a ridiculous distinction and to hinge accusing someone of engaging in misandry on that just tells me you recently found a new word to make your red pill-lite views more palatable.

[–] rah@feddit.uk -3 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (2 children)

That’s a ridiculous distinction

I'm not sure what distinction you're referring to. I don't care either.

Edit: for that matter, I'm mystified as to why you are continuing to engage with me if you genuinely believe that I am victim blaming. Unless you don't genuinely believe I am victim blaming, in which case why would you accuse me of that. Despicable.

[–] Scranulum@lemm.ee 3 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

"Oh, I'm spreading rhetoric that hurts people? Why are you even responding to it, then?"

Your entire edit is actually a perfect microcosm of the victim blaming mentality, but (poorly) disguised as a virtue signal about victim blaming. Well done mate. Despicable.

[–] LandedGentry@lemmy.zip 3 points 18 hours ago

waiting for his brave take on men’s rights and reverse discrimination

[–] rah@feddit.uk 0 points 18 hours ago (3 children)

"Oh, I'm spreading rhetoric that hurts people? Why are you even responding to it, then?"

That's not really a fair characterisation of the situation given that they said elsewhere:

"Later dude. This isn’t going to be productive."

[–] LandedGentry@lemmy.zip 4 points 17 hours ago

Look, I wanted to come back and apologize. We are clearly ganging up on you a little bit here and this has gotten kind of nasty. I’m sorry for my part in it, and I don’t like being a bully/contributing to negativity online. Yet I did, and I own that.

I seriously, honestly insist that you take a look at what we were talking about earlier and really assess the discussion critically. I imagine you mean well, but thereare some seriously troubling implications with your rhetoric and the way you are talking about these subjects. You don’t have to agree with us, but I think if you take a step back and just give it some thought you might see at least some small thing worth addressing or reconsidering. Have a good one, sorry again

[–] Scranulum@lemm.ee 3 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

If you believe that hateful, harmful ideas shouldn't be challenged and should be allowed to stand on their own as long as the person spewing them is sufficienly annoying, sure, mate. Unfair characterization.

Or maybe you just said even dumber shit in response and they changed their mind. Even the brightest among us may never know. Truly confounding.

You have now retreated to "but they promised they would stop talking," btw. Just keeping you aware of the scoreboard here, so to speak.

[–] rah@feddit.uk -2 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

If you believe that hateful, harmful ideas shouldn't be challenged

I don't see any challenging, just flailing.

scoreboard

Oh dear.

[–] Scranulum@lemm.ee 1 points 18 hours ago

I don't see

Finally, we agree on something. Cheers.

[–] LandedGentry@lemmy.zip 1 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

That edit is despicable

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)