About my experience: I've listened to AI-generated music (for example, I've seen creators with local AI that they've retrained a bit to 3-10 percent, and that's pretty good, it's like listening to a masterpiece of art without waiting for a new song for a long time, but they still can't compare to cloud music, and it doesn't matter if it's AI-generated, because the background for games or other activities is perfect. I think in the coming years, people will idolize AI. But I still prefer music made by humans, because it frees me from apathy and gives me motivation to live, even if it's worse.)
About NSFW AI-Generated Content, I think it perfectly shows how happy people are:
I've seen people discussing it on Reddit, saying it satisfies their tastes perfectly, and I decided to give it a try, comparing it to NSFW human-generated content up to 2025-2026, but I could hardly find any differences, and the quality of some local AI creators is extremely high. Especially if it's cartoons, anime comics, or videos, not everything is perfect in the video yet, although the moans and sounds are mesmerizing, better than the real moans of people. In general, unlike other creative industries, there are practically no refusals here. I haven't tried it because I don't like it, but it was already obvious from people's comments that they were fascinated like Romans watching the battles in the Colosseum.
Here I took a few comments, these are more or less adequate:
2025-11-15
User1(Real name hidden): Excellent work!, User2(Real name hidden): Holy shiiiiiiit! Such perfection! Such beauty! Such power!.
2025-10-29
User3(Real name hidden): Will you be opening up commissions soon? I'm curious ๐
2025-09-20
User4(Real name hidden): Dude I can't get enough of telling you, would pay double for more of this! AMAZING JOB
I'm against AI slop, but I can see it being used effectively as a creative tool to take the grunt work out of creative works.
For example, one of my aunts is a published author and she has taken to using AI as an editorial assistant.
In her words:
"Speaking of AIs, I'm using ChatGPT as a story editor, assisting me with matters such as voice, tone, structure, plotting, cadence, pacing, character development, etc. It's like working with an extremely intelligent and knowledgeable human story editor. Better, because it's free; a human equivalent would cost a lot, perhaps thousands."
To be clear, she still does all the writing, ChatGPT is merely offering editorial advice. I could see providing it a text and asking it to show every case where tense is mismatched, or any shifts from 1st person to 3rd person, that kind of thing.
At that point is it really any worse than an advanced spell or grammar checker?
You gotta be careful with that. If human writers use AI editing tools, the end results can get flagged as AI-generated. There's also some question about how much/little AI-use is ok. Source: