this post was submitted on 01 May 2026
224 points (84.6% liked)

Fediverse

42015 readers
282 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, Mbin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I did some analysis of the modlog and found this:

V8lPrxY1qxcISLe.png

Ok, bigger instances ban more often. Not surprising, because they have more communities and more users and more trouble. But hang on, dbzer0 isn't a very big instance. What happens if we do a ratio of bans vs number of users?

vyfUNYTrX9pHQeR.png

Ok, so lemmy.ml, dbzer0 and pawb are issue an outsized amount of bans for the number of users they have... But surely the number of communities the instance hosts is going to mean they have to ban more? Bans are used to moderate communities, not just to shield their user-base from the outside. Let's look at the number of bans per community hosted:

Yrc7TofOr88SeGt.png

Seems like dbzer0 really loves to ban. Even more than the marxists and the furries! What is it about dbzer0 that makes them such prolific banners?

Raw-ish numbers and calculations are in this spreadsheet if anyone wants to make their own charts.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] atopi@piefed.blahaj.zone 11 points 1 week ago (2 children)

i expected blahaj.zone to have more bans since as far as i know its supposed to be a safe place and less tolerant of transphobia (along with there being no downvotes to bury hateful comments and posts)

[–] hildegarde@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I'm also surprised. I expected higher numbers from the instance that describes itself as

a server that is very protective of our minority members and bigotry of any variety will be squashed with great prejudice.

Or perhaps I should be delighted that few bans are needed to achieve it.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Or perhaps I should be delighted that few bans are needed to achieve it.

This has been my experience on blahaj. Really happy with my home instance

[–] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 week ago

Blahaj is overall a fantastic instance, it was my first home.

[–] qaz@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I think they're defederated from poorly moderated instances and therefore don't need to ban as many users. Perhaps db0 doesn't defederate as often?

[–] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Db0 only defederates with community vote, and same for re-federating.

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Except for CSAM and clear bigotry.

[–] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Forgot about that, that seems to rarely happen as a user.

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 week ago

We're being fairly precautionary about it.

[–] FatherPeanut@pawb.social 7 points 1 week ago

I think that's a weird quirk of Lemmy in general, is that the lot of us tend to be much more accepting of differences. I haven't exactly spent too much time around, but nobody's mentioned my instance or 'queerness' in ill intent, even when disagreements happen.

But also if there are instances or groups created where a very large portion of said instance is bigoted, it's very easy to just defederate and move on.