this post was submitted on 16 May 2026
794 points (99.5% liked)

Technology

84733 readers
4046 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ZombieCyborgFromOuterSpace@piefed.ca 28 points 1 day ago (1 children)

In some countries, this is illegal.

[–] RIotingPacifist@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

What countries? This is capitalism baby, only way to stop it is to have a union strong enough to fuck Up that record profit if the CEO even jokes a out layoffs.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 3 points 20 hours ago

This is capitalism baby

Other countries handle capitalism different.

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 24 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

Japan. Layoffs are extremely difficult to pull off there. You have to show poor performance by the individual involved, and the standards for that are very rigorous. The government knows that unemployed people immediately become their problem, so they just demand that if a corporation wants to employ someone, they have to be willing to enter into that in an open ended arrangement. So unions aren’t the only way.

[–] charonn0@startrek.website 2 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

I'm curious how it's considered a "layoff" if it's based on performance rather than the job itself being eliminated.

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

It’s not.

What I meant was you can dismiss people for poor performance, but that’s the only valid reason. You cannot lay people off in Japan in the sense of “we cut the budget and decided we don’t want to employ you anymore.”

However, that said… if you want to lay someone off, you can jump through a million hoops. I have seen people relegated to ridiculously inappropriate roles to convince them to leave. You can also mess with non-salary compensation if you want. And you can offer generous severance. And maybe you can convince people to let you “lay them off.”

[–] some_designer_dude@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

America’s trick for this is to let the unemployed become their own problem! 👏

[–] stringere@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 day ago

Wrong. The unemployed are just temporarily displaced slaves waiting to become homeless so they can be put in prison for poorcrime.