this post was submitted on 18 May 2026
954 points (98.5% liked)

Programmer Humor

31506 readers
1543 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] curiousaur@reddthat.com 118 points 2 days ago (4 children)

It is truly, deeply amazing how bad Microsoft is. Proton on Linux is FASTER than the actual directX it's emulating is on windows. They got beat at their own instruction layer.

[–] YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I believe proton isn't emulating but rather is a direct instruction layer. I'm ootl for close to a decade plus, but the commonly cited number was you need hardware 7x the power of original equipment to properly emulate.

[–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 68 points 1 day ago (7 children)

And they had Skype, which was practically a genericized trademark for "video call--" until first Apple's FaceTime and then Zoom utterly took them apart.

And they had Office, which defined the product category so completely that it's called "office software--" but then Google Docs took them apart on a molecular level.

Microsoft is the king of snatching defeat from the clutching jaws of victory.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 43 points 1 day ago (2 children)

but then Google Docs took them apart

Tapping the breaks on that one.

Google Docs is very lightweight, but it's also very stripped down. Word remains the first choice in word processors for 90% of the market. It (and Excel) are a big reason offices haven't seriously begun abandoning Microsoft.

[–] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago

Tapping the breaks on that one.

You don't wanna do that. The whole thing could shatter!

[–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

I don't think that's the case, but I only have anecdotal evidence for that. I haven't ever worked at a company where Office was the preference, and the last three I've worked at didn't even offer it as a default. And I'm in my forties.

[–] RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world 1 points 12 hours ago

I'd never use Google Docs for any long-form writing. I wouldn't even trust the online nature of it, not having the file stored locally.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I haven’t ever worked at a company where Office was the preference,

I haven't worked at an office where it wasn't. And I've done years of consulting at Deloitte, so I've seen a few places.

[–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Fair, which is why anecdote isn't the singular of data I guess.

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 7 points 1 day ago

Many govt agencies around the world pay for Office 365 or similars. Where I work (govt health), some higher ups demand pro-level M$ office accounts. Those ain't cheap.

I suspect the vast majority of USA govt (state and federal), plus many European govts, pay a fortune for Office

[–] firelizzard@programming.dev 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Virtually every company I’ve worked at used Office primarily. And by the looks of the other comments your experience seems to be atypical.

[–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago
[–] kilgore_trout@feddit.it 20 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Microsoft acquired Skype, did not create it. Then destryed it with its own hands.

[–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago

They acquired practically everything they have. They haven't created anything truly new since the mid-90s.

[–] socsa@piefed.social 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It wasn't that they destroyed it, it was more that they let it bit rot. Skype was honestly never a great user experience by today's standards. The audio was bad, the connection was very unstable over mobile networks, and push notifications for calls was hit or miss. Microsoft acquired it, slapped a Microsoft login screen on it and then basically didn't do anything to improve it. Meanwhile, Google created and killed seventy different video calling apps, which all worked better than Skype, and Apple stuck the landing with FaceTime.

[–] zod000@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 day ago

Actually, they didn't just let Skype rot, they changed a bunch of things on it for the worse IMO. Skype used to be peer to peer (I believe the name is literally supposed to be a combination of "sky" and "peer to peer"), MS took that away to funnel it all through Azure. They redesigned the UI multiple times trying to follow the trend of whatever new app became popular (one was clearly trying the be a knockoff Snapchat). They forced all users to create Microsoft accounts to keep using Skype.

Not all their changes were bad, they did finally make a Linux client, which after many years became stable enough to use.

[–] eatham@aussie.zone 13 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Google docs is far worse than office, in every way except for collaboration. It does not destroy them at all. LibreOffice is on par except for having no collaboration, but is not widely used so definitely haven't destroyed them. Office is still very successful and probably won't be gone anytime soon

[–] RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world 1 points 12 hours ago

Libre Office is also missing one very simple thing which means I personally can't use it for anything more than a few pages, let alone 100. A normal static scroll bar with static buttons on it. It's a program literally centered around scrolling up and down, and your only option is spinning a little wheel or grabbing an invisible handle. I use OpenOffice.

[–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Fair enough, I stand corrected.

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 6 points 1 day ago

Office is still very successful and probably won’t be gone anytime soon

Unfortunately for almost the entirety of the corporate world and govt bureaucracy.

[–] red_tomato@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

They also had Internet Explorer. When it was released it was actually good (compared to the competition). Internet Explorer was dominant, but then it turned into the punching bag of web browser memes.

[–] psud@aussie.zone 1 points 14 hours ago

It's not that internet explorer was good that made it successful, it was packaged with windows where Netscape wasn't. People used the one that was already on their computer, then as they got market share they extended http to encourage sites to make stuff that wouldn't work in Netscape, and couldn't due to patents

By the time Microsoft was forced to unbundle IE and windows it was very hard for Netscape to get market share back

[–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

I think that Microsoft is paralyzed by corporate culture. Everything needs to be signed off by multiple stakeholders, everything needs a dozen meetings before anyone can make a decision, and as a result the stuff that's "good enough" (read: still making money) languishes--or worse, becomes a dumping ground for whatever corporate pet project is exciting--until it's unacceptably awful, mired under decades of technical debt and spaghetti code fixes.

At least they have the sense to let the successful companies they acquire manage themselves. There's no AI in Minecraft, for instance.

[–] timestatic@feddit.org 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

And discord somehow took everyone from skype.

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 5 points 1 day ago

And from TeamSpeak.

[–] FizzyOrange@programming.dev 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

which defined the product category so completely that it’s called “office software–”

Err, no it's called office software because it's software you use in an office. Microsoft didn't invent the word "office".

[–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

No, of course they didn't invent the word. But they popularized the composition of the bundle (word processor, spreadsheet, presentation software) and the idea of calling that bundle an "office suite," a pattern which almost all such suites still follow today.

[–] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 5 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Is Google Docs as popular as Microsoft Office?

I work in finance/insurance and can't see a way to move away for Excel (there's still there spreadsheets with 10+ years still being used).

My wife's company uses GDocs, but they're do food research and barely uses those programs.

[–] socsa@piefed.social 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This is because Microsoft intentionally breaks excel and PP compatibility with Google docs in small but important ways. It's the only thing keeping them afloat at this point. I have gotten into heated debates at work over this, because I prefer Google docs, but my boss will be like "we need to deliver this to customers who will open it in office and the formatting will break" and I'm like "that's what a pdf is for."

[–] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 4 points 1 day ago

yup. anything you ship to anyone should be PDF regardless.

[–] eatham@aussie.zone 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I would doubt it, it is nowhere near as good as office and google sheets specifically has much smaller worksheets than excel, with only 26 rows.

[–] OpenStars@piefed.social 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] lagoon8622@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

But Google Sheets isn't limited to 26 rows, 26 columns, or 26 worksheets. Idk what GP was talking about. It's certainly limited but not to that extent

[–] OpenStars@piefed.social 1 points 1 day ago

I wonder if it is more limited in certain contexts, such as on a mobile device (like on iOS? I don't have one to test).

[–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

As far as I can tell, Google Docs is at feature-parity with Office, and yes, is incredibly popular. The contest might be a bit more even in the corporate space, but at the last three companies I've worked for, GSuite was the default and you had to ask for Office.

[–] 3abas@lemmy.world 30 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Proton (and Wine, what it's based on) are not emulators. They are compatibility layers, it translates Windows system calls to native Linux system calls.

[–] Kaiserschmarrn@feddit.org 31 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Or simply put: Wine Is Not an Emulator

[–] luciferofastora@feddit.org 18 points 1 day ago

That isn't "simply put". It's a witty way to phrase half the comment, completely omitting the other half that actually explains what it does. WINE is a clever abbreviation as a name for the tool, but the opposite of descriptive about its purpose or function.

[–] zerofk@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] 9bananas@feddit.org 5 points 1 day ago

"Wine Is No Emulator" works ;)

[–] MrKoyun@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

Yes... I actually cannot fathom just how incessantly bad a company can manage to be, and how some people still refuse to realise how there's literally nothing of value to be had from anything made by Microsoft.