Not The Onion

16090 readers

1364 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

Links to news stories from...
...credible sources, with...
...their original headlines, that...
...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

kescusay@lemmy.world

921

Author of Texas bill to ban 'furries' in schools cannot come up with examples of it happening (web.archive.org)

submitted 2 days ago by ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net to c/nottheonion@lemmy.world

96 comments fedilink hide all child comments

A Texas bill, known as the FURRIES Act, would ban non-human behaviors in public schools, including the use of litter boxes and wearing animal accessories.

Rep. Stan Gerdes, the bill's author, claimed schools were providing litter boxes for students acting as "furries."

When pressed, Gerdes could not find an example. The bill was left pending in committee.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

The number of guns we have is completely irrelevant to the matter at hand. The relevant issue is the opinions of the people who would actually be affected by the law.

Gun control is one of the major reasons why people in 42 of our 50 states are dissatisfied with the Democrats. Gun control is one of the major reasons why Trump is now in office.

Democratic leadership should have learned this lesson two decades ago, when our Federal Assault Weapons Ban sunsetted, Democrats couldn't get it renewed, and the US went from generally banning concealed carry to generally licensing it. Failing to recognize that fact in 2004, Democratic leadership should have picked up on it from pro-gun legislation passing in 42 states. But no, they were hell bent on pushing 1980's gun control efforts, and ignoring any pushback against that position.

Democratic leadership refusing to follow the will of the people is how the US got itself in this disaster.

[–] MangoCats@feddit.it 1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

The assault weapons ban in Australia forced the retirement of the entire set of politicians who voted for it.

They have no regrets, it is a good law and makes their country a better place to live for them and their children.

[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 1 points 6 hours ago

The assault weapons ban the US had from 1994 to 2004 didn't force the retirement of the entire set of politicians who voted for it. It simply drove the majority position across party lines, and left everyone wondering how the hell the Democrats become so out of touch with their own constituents.