this post was submitted on 26 May 2026
112 points (78.0% liked)

Selfhosted

56957 readers
1125 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

  7. No low-effort posts. This is subjective and will largely be determined by the community member reports.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I've been thinking about this more and more. According to the sidebar, this community is "A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don’t control." Based on that I don't think Plex qualifies.

Privacy: Plex clearly records the metadata of what you watch. When I used it, it would send me a report by email of what my "friends" were watching. Even with that turned off, their services still track telemetry.

Control: Plex has all of it. They can (and do) make unilateral changes to the service, how authentication works, where you can run it, etc.

So I ask, when you are hosting something that is entirely dependent on a commercial entity to function, is Plex really selfhosting in the spirit of this community?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BryceBassitt@lemmy.blahaj.zone -1 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

If not a lie, you were simply misinformed. Hopefully you will no longer be

[–] kaidenshi@lemmy.world 2 points 16 hours ago (3 children)

I’ll say it again: it was my experience at the time, ten years ago. There is no misinformation. Apparently the situation has changed for the better for Plex users and that’s great. But I’m not going to change what I said, because it was what I experienced; to do so would be misinformation.

[–] TechSquidTV@lemmy.world 0 points 6 hours ago

The situation did not change. You were wrong ten years ago too.

[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 1 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 children)

Well, grammatical quibble then.

Your verbs are present tense and not past tense:

Plex requires a Plex Pass subscription

Plex doesn’t allow you to watch media on your local network

This gives the impression that you're talking about the current state of things. Which seems to be the above commenter's issue.

Where as:

Plex required a Plex Pass subscription

or

Plex didn't allow you to watch media on your local network

Would imply a past experience.

Misinformation doesn't mean that you're intentionally lying (that is disinformation), it just means that you're stating facts that are not true.

(I'm not being negative, just pedantic lol)


To actually contribute to the conversation:

Plex now allows local network streaming without their servers being offline as long as your client is already authenticated (cached tokens have a short expiration date however)

Alternatively, you can add your LAN's subnet in Settings > Server > Network > 'List of IP addresses and networks that are allowed without auth'

Here's a full written guide: https://forums.plex.tv/t/howto-use-plex-with-no-internet/383325

[–] kaidenshi@lemmy.world 2 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Your verbs are present tense and not past tense

I was clear in other comments that I was speaking of what I knew to be true at the time, therefore the tense was correct from my perspective. I was told that the situation changed about seven years ago, I acknowledged this and expressed happiness for current Plex users, and then came several different people piling on telling me I'm lying, I'm wrong, I'm misleading, even after I stated that my experience was ten years ago and I acknowledged that things had changed since then.

To be abundantly clear, from my point of view before I was corrected, the present tense was correct based on my experience. I acknowledged the corrections and was still accused of lying and misrepresenting. I just don't get that. I don't understand why immediately acknowledging and accepting and even expressing genuine happiness that the situation has changed leads to attacks from all sides. I don't understand why any of you refuse to acknowledge that I was speaking of an experience a decade ago, you all insist that I'm trying to say that is how it is now, and I'm not fucking doing that at all.

This place takes itself way, way too seriously, in my opinion. I'm sorry for any toes I stepped on without even meaning to, and I won't comment on the matter further.

[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 2 points 13 hours ago

I understood the misunderstanding from reading the previous comments.

I was clear in other comments that I was speaking of what I knew to be true at the time, therefore the tense was correct from my perspective.

I didn't say you were intentionally lying, only that you were mistaken. I wasn't making a personal attack.

I acknowledge that based on your experience that is how Plex worked 10 years ago, but it is not how it currently works. So, when you say that 'this is how Plex works' instead of 'this is how Plex worked 10 years ago' it's implying that it still works like that when it does not. That could confuse people who are here and trying to learn.

This place takes itself way, way too seriously, in my opinion. I’m sorry for any toes I stepped on without even meaning to, and I won’t comment on the matter further.

The community exists to talk about, and help people with, self hosting. Providing incorrect information runs counter to that purpose and so community members should point out when information isn't correct.

Misinformation just means that the information that you're providing is not correct, it's not a personal attack on you to be corrected about a factual issue. It doesn't mean that you're a bad person or suggest that you're trying to be intentionally misleading, it just means that your statements do not match the current factual reality.

[–] _g_be@lemmy.world 1 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

The difference between "this is true" and "this was true ten years ago" is huge.

Presenting one as the other is why you're being challenged

[–] kaidenshi@lemmy.world 0 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

I never misrepresented anything. I spoke of my experience, and when I was told the situation had changed I was clear in several comments that I was happy it is now better for current users. You are talking as if I am intentionally misleading people when it’s clear that I am not. Why are you doing that?

[–] _g_be@lemmy.world -1 points 10 hours ago

intentionally misleading

I didn't suggest you did it intentionally.

I am suggesting that you are being challenged by others because your sentence as written and without the context of the other comments is incorrect, whether intentionally or unintentionally.