Is that an official legal stance? I love it, but I've also seen undercover cops do the same stuff on the internet and with laws like Qualified Immunity I reckon that there are already laws in place to support these "just" actions
_g_be
joined 2 years ago
Your perspective is very generous to Elon. "It's a cheap part, why would they omit it? Probably it was some dumb kid working there".
Usually cost-cutting measures that make significant compromises are top-down pushes, profit is their concern. Might not have been the CEO himself but, in my perspective, it would have been from the top levels.
someone
Yeahhh pretty sure I know who
It's the generous interpretation where Trump abused the bankruptcy system for his own benefit, and I definitely agree.
Still wouldn't want a country run that way, the people are the consumers about to be conned or the investors about to be fleeced.
lol the game streaming service. Where people both full priced games and lost access after they closed the service