this post was submitted on 26 May 2026

655 points (99.1% liked)

Programmer Humor

31576 readers

2166 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

Keep content in english
No advertisements
Posts must be related to programming or programmer topics

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

anzo@programming.dev

Feyter@programming.dev

BurningTurtle@programming.dev

pylapp@programming.dev

655

Looks good to me, approved (feddit.it)

submitted 17 hours ago by Hexagon@feddit.it to c/programmer_humor@programming.dev

28 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Flower@sh.itjust.works 9 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

No still wouldn’t do it

And then suggests the solution it complained about in the first place.

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 3 points 5 hours ago

Yep, seen this.

Also, each iteration saying "ok, all problems are now addressed, the check should be fine, but running it just in case" (generates even more build errors than before). Rinse and repeat until my token quota is exhausted and I just code the good old fashioned way, no skin off my back. And I'm doing a 'good job' with utilization, despite having burned most of my quota on a failure that got thrown away.