this post was submitted on 03 Jun 2026
776 points (97.2% liked)

Technology

85136 readers
4270 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

“Experts in Europe warn that these devices are used to record strangers without their consent, possibly breaching EU law.”

“A small LED light is designed to indicate when recording is taking place, but RTBF's investigators found that tutorials explaining how to conceal the indicator are abundant and easily accessible online.”

Sometimes I have a hard time deciding who I despise more, parasite Mark Zuckerberg or its witless hosts who keep using its products—yes, Zuck's pronoun is it. Ban Ray-Ban, for frick's sake.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ModernRisk@lemmy.dbzer0.com 171 points 1 day ago (7 children)

Who would’ve known this would happen? Everyone. Meta knew people would use it for the bad and they still decided to go on with it because money.

Hope there will be a way to prevent being recorded, like some tech that disables it or something.

[–] Patrikvo@lemmy.zip 23 points 1 day ago (1 children)

like some tech that disables it or something.

The word you're looking for is "hammer".

[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Baseball bats have better range.

[–] Patrikvo@lemmy.zip 4 points 23 hours ago

Yeah, but nothing delivers the message better than calming grabbing the glasses, put them on the table in front of the glasshole, smash them with the hammer in a single confident blow and then placing the remnants back on their face. No words spoken, just a powerfull message delivered.

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 33 points 1 day ago (2 children)

There are lights that work on some cameras. I'm not sure which (infrared, I think prolly others). Search the web. They exist. But how are you gonna have that at all times everywhere? Easier to set the Meta HQ on fire. And that's prolly not easy.

[–] Manjushri@piefed.social 8 points 1 day ago

But how are you gonna have that at all times everywhere?

Someone made a hoodie with IR LED lights all around the face. I bet one could also build it into a necklace or something, but you'd need some sort of battery in your pocket to power them.

The real problem with these is that they are only really effective at night. In daylight, the blinding effect of the LEDs is minimized.

[–] Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

There are lights that work on some cameras. [...] Search the web. They exist.

Or look in real life :-)

They are small and you can see them only from some specific angle. And not quite bright.

[–] ParadoxSeahorse@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

I think they are referring to camera-blinding IR lights

there are open source android apps that tell you when a meta rayban is nearby (using the phone's ability to scan nearby bluetooth devices) which isn't really good enough but it's something i guess

https://github.com/yjeanrenaud/yj_nearbyglasses

if you're a woman and the creep is a man, there's always the option of pepper spray i guess, though then you will have to justify yourself somehow. i don't think predominantly male chud cops will accept the reasoning of "i feel unsafe" from women, even if it's true and valid.

as for impractical ideas, you can always carry around a 5W laser pointer and then try and fry the camera. of course does not work irl.

[–] Iusedtobeanalien@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago

People will always find ways to abuse technology.

[–] kbobabob@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 day ago

It's a good thing they brought in "experts" to point this out.

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz -2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Years ago I tried calling out the normalization of anybody recording anybody in public without their knowledge or consent, and nobody cared because I was a man so they thought I didn't deserve privacy. Now the headlines frame it as a women's issue and suddenly everyone cares.

It's not a gendered thing. It's a privacy issue. People didn't care when I raised concerns about it, and I'm not surprised that it's biting people on the ass.

I still think it's wrong, I just don't find it surprising given people's reactions whenever I raised concerns about it.

Also, ray-ban was stupid for allowing this because obviously nobody is going to buy their shit anymore. They had a distinctive design that now nobody is going to trust...

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I can tell you the vast majority of people don't care AND Raybans gets their name in the media more often so it's marketing for them.

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That's putting a lot of weight in the "all publicity is good publicity" assumption

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 1 points 12 hours ago

When nobody gives a fuck, it unfortunately holds true.

[–] KingThrillgore@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

They've made crap sunglasses for a while now. I went to another company for my Aviators.

[–] gramie@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago

I hate to tell you, but whatever the other company you went to is, it's almost certainly Luxottica, the same people who make Ray-Ban now.

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 0 points 1 day ago

I never said I liked raybans, but for a while over a decade ago they were all the rage with the hipster/indie crowd. People liked them, and their style was distinctive. So distinctive that even a cheap knockoff were called "raybans" for the shape of the frame and lenses.

Now no one in their right mind besides annoying tech bros are going to wear raybans, because anyone who sees them is going to assume they have cameras with facial recognition linked to meta's servers.

[–] lyralycan@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I've always thought an EMP bomb would do some good. Snap worker bees out of their unhealthy relationship with working, disable vehicles, make people fulfil their needs physically

[–] idiomaddict@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago

I figured that would kill pacemakers, but it might not. it’ll definitely kill electric wheelchairs and insulin fridges though.

[–] Wildmimic@anarchist.nexus 9 points 1 day ago (2 children)

kill everyone with a pacemaker, disable emergency systems, create traffic chaos

[–] lyralycan@sh.itjust.works 1 points 11 hours ago

Damn, poor pacemaker dudes

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 day ago

Satan laughing spreads his wiiiiinngggssss