this post was submitted on 09 Jun 2026
1107 points (99.5% liked)

Technology

85297 readers
4194 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

For a while now the transition away from Manifest V2 (MV2) to MV3 has been on-going and it looks like it is entering its final phase of deprecation, at least, in the case of Google Chrome. A recent discussion thread in the w3c WebExtensions Community Group GitHub repo has highlighted how the latest and upcoming versions of the most popular browser are expected to be its final releases with support for MV2 extensions.

What this essentially means is that the tricks and bypasses that were used to keep MV2 extensions like uBlock Origin and others alive will not work any more on Chrome, or at least not for very long. For example the Windows Registry mod that could extend MV2 availability will cease to function after Chromium version 151.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They don't even try to pretend to fight it.

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago (3 children)

because theres no fighting google.

Microsoft tried, and google won, which is why Edge became a chrome reskin instead of what it was before.

[–] ironycanal@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah, but the worse they are the longer they live apparently.

[–] ironycanal@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Luckily, that's something you can change!

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

To avoid a visit by the FBI, I will say no its not.

[–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 1 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

Ah an american, in their natural habitat of giving up before even trying. Nothing can ever change, no point, etc. etc.

[–] tocopherol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

They aren't saying they're giving up, we just avoid posting certain comments to avoid potential scrutiny from the surveillance panopticon.

[–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 2 points 9 hours ago

What an odd thing to say from the "land of the free"

[–] ironycanal@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

That's just not true. You can always murder a bunch of innocent people or make it more racist. Try understanding a culture before you talk shit next time.

[–] BNE@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 20 hours ago

You sound like onna those communists Mr Reagan told me is, like, ten times more scary than people different colours to me.

Don't type! I'm armed!

[–] MadPsyentist@lemmy.nz 2 points 23 hours ago

Microsoft "tried" about as well as a quadraplegic "tries" free climbing

[–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The winning move is not to do business with them, don't compete just exist and pretend they don't exist. Microslop played the game and lost, but it is a stupid silly game.

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (2 children)

kinda hard to do when google holds the internet by the balls. and can twist at any moment to get what they want.

Microsoft and Mozilla employees have both accused them of doing this in the past, to sabotage non-chrome browsers on google services, to make chrome look better and drive users to chrome.

[–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 1 points 23 hours ago

News to me, Does google hold this site by the balls? They have a lot of power yes, but they are not some unsinkable boat.

[–] Babalugats@feddit.uk -1 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

They only 'hold the internet by the balls' if you are using and reliant on Google products.

There are hundreds (if not more) tutorials and lists online to guide you through degoogling

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 2 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (1 children)

I'm sure we can get thousands of websites and every major corporation to degoogle cause you said they should.

[–] Babalugats@feddit.uk -1 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

Where did I say they should? (I do think it, but didn't say it).

The only person here that spoke supposed 'facts' was you, saying that Google holds the internet by the balls. Which is true only in your corner of the world. Google definitely has a majority control, but we already have a big (and growing) movement with European Digital Sovereignity, De-Googling and loads of others.

Up to you if you want to let Google hold the internet that you use 'by the balls'.