World News
A community for discussing events around the World
Rules:
-
Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
-
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
-
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed.
-
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
-
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF OCTOBER 19 2025
-
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
-
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
-
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
Lemmy World Partners
News !news@lemmy.world
Politics !politics@lemmy.world
World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world
Ask Historians !askhistorians@lemmy.world
Recommendations
For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/
- Consider including the article’s mediabiasfactcheck.com/ link
view the rest of the comments
I mean this is horrible treatment of him and obvious racism but I don't think we can fault fifa for removing him for this. Like let's say you are an expert in brain surgery and there is a conference on brain surgery in France. You plan to go and give a talk. You get to the airport and for any reason you are told you are not allowed to enter France. Your employer is notified. What should they do? Obvious answer to me try to ask nicely to please let you into France, if still denied assign a Co worker of you to give the talk in your place.
What else could fifa do? "well this guy isn't able to referee so guess lets cancel the world cup" or maybe "technically he's not allowed in the country but let's sneak him in by putting him in a suit case and walking very confidently. Then we'll put him on international TV showing him in the country" or "let's hire a private militia and try to force the government to accept him".
Obviously he should be allowed to referee and yes it obvious racism by the government(if there was a real reason they would of said that) and fifa is a corrupt evil company but... Isn't this the only logical choice for fifa??
Fifa can easily demand the host country to fullfill their obligations, and if not they could let him referree World Cup matches in Mexico and Canada.
True about Mexico and Canada but a demand means nothing without a backing. Your boss can demand or you will be fired. A pilot can demand or you're kicked off flight. An Uber driver can demand or you will be left behind. Fifa can demand and if denied(sounds like what happened), then what? Yeah it's a fucked up situation and he should be allowed in to referee but I fifa has no authority to demand he's allowed entry.
I mean FIFA kinda hosts the whole thing, they have significant power. But they gave Trump a FIFA peace prize and won't ban Israel despite banning Russia.
The real reason FIFA won't put in any efort is pretty obvious. It's a sportswashing tool completely owned by the West.
They have power because they bring tourism to the cities, except they are not selling seats, hotel room or plane tickets as expected by investors according to articles I saw so what power do they have?
This could have been a huge PR win for FIFA, especially given their current reputation. Without digging too much into the logistics:
I don't know if any of these has been done, but seeing as how FIFA leadership has capitulated to the whims of our asshole-in-chief in the past, it's tough to believe they would have acted like decent people.
Ok, yeah I will agree with this. Pay him, allow him to operate outside of USA if possible and issue a statement of support. Basically no cost to fifa and good pr. Good choice.
I think if FIFA was going to think logically, they wouldn't be a corrupt, evil company.
Ok, so you are now in charge of fifa. How do you handle this situation?
Immediately dissolve FIFA, and turn myself in to the proper authorities, and still probably face basically no consequences.
Would you? Like really? That may be a good thought but you work your entire life to gain this career, you build a family on these resources, you build a life on soccer... A guy is not allowed into the US, fuck it let's abandon everything and decide to live in a jail. Still guy is not allowed in to the US, games still go on but I must easy toast everyday for the rest of my life... Would you do that?
I can only say yes so many times, and also point out again that it would probably include like, a couple weeks or months of jail time, and then I'd be free to go do as much evil shit as I wanted.
FIFA is about money, first and foremost. Kicking balls around and fairness are really much further down the list. Bowing down to Trump is what is happening here, no 2 ways about it.
Not denying that, but what should they do?
Keep him on, but invite another referee to fill his place.
How? Like he physically can't to the game...
Keep him on the list. Even if he can't be there, it's still a sign that you don't take the decision lying down. Of course, Infantino would not do that because he does not give a single shit about any of this, but you could save face.
And the point being? For example if an actor or actress has their name in the credits at the end of a movie I believe that's good for their career but would this have any effect?
I mean imagine interviewing this guy "fun fact: I referred the world cup. Ok.. I didn't actually referee the world cup but my name was on a list". He may be the best carpenter ever but I don't see the difference in being on the list or not.
Hell, without any searching on a website... Name a single other referee. They do hard work, as do shelf stockers and construction workers, I'm not discounting that. Honestly all this controversy may actually help him. It shows the us as being assholes but... If you ran a local soccer tournament and were looking for a referee, would you DARE turn him down and face the wrath of the internet?
If you don't get the point of showing the least bit of backbone, I can't help you.
They should show backbone, the other commentor saying to pay him and try to give him opportunity in Canada or Mexico I agree with. My point is there is no really good solution for them. What backbone do you want them to show on this? What should they do?
You just described a perfectly good solution.
That's even better than mine, but mine would still be better than to drop him entirely.
The reason FIFA hasn't done any of the things suggested to you isnt a lack of good options, it's that FIFA sees no issue with this. Doing anything about this would risk FIFA's comfy home in Trump's rear.