this post was submitted on 12 Jun 2026
448 points (98.5% liked)

World News

57322 readers
1240 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A British judge has sentenced four Palestine Action protesters as terrorists, handing them custodial sentences ranging from four to eight years.

The unprecedented ruling came despite jurors convicting them of criminal charges not connected to terrorism during the prosecution.

On Friday, the presiding judge, Justice Jeremy Johnson, added a “terrorism connection” to their offences.

In a preliminary ruling in March 2025, Johnson found an "appearance" of a terrorism connection in the case, as he said the activists were attempting to influence the Israeli government by restricting their access to weapons. This information was withheld from the jury who convicted them.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Jake_Farm@sopuli.xyz 79 points 1 month ago (6 children)

So terrorism just doesn't mean anything anymore.

[–] neobunch@lemmy.world 46 points 1 month ago

Ironically, it means the same it has always meant: resistance to colonization/imperialism/opression, it's just that in the past it was disguised with the veil of "civilization", and now the mask is off and you can see the naked brutal truth of how the term has always been weaponized

[–] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 month ago

It's literally a disinhibitive ruling. Someone somewhere will inevitably think "well if I'm going to be called a terrorist anyway for some property damage, why not shoot at the cop that's coming to stop me? In for a penny in for a pound."

[–] Malyca@lemmy.zip 10 points 1 month ago
[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It does mean something, just not what's in the dictionary. The definition: "The use of violence or the threat of violence, especially against civilians, in the pursuit of political goals." Based on that, police are constantly using terrorism, but they're almost never said to be. The state has a monopoly on violence. Terrorism is just a term they use to support that. You acting against the state?" Terrorism." The state acting against you?" Justice."

[–] Jake_Farm@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

But also by that definition, these guys don't count as terrorists

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 month ago

Yeah, that's my point. Terrorism is just whatever the state doesn't like at this point. The dictionary definition has no relation to the definition they use.

In the eyes of the oppressor ...

[–] wpb@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

It's always been a label so subjective that it's essentially meaningless. There's a reason why most big name news cables have "don't use the word terror or terrorist" in their style guides.