this post was submitted on 19 Jun 2026
480 points (97.6% liked)

Technology

85570 readers
3683 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Nioxic@lemmy.dbzer0.com -3 points 1 day ago (4 children)

I keep hearing this and the opposite

What about different battery types? Those with/without kobolt for example

Also manufacuring might be done differently in different places.. wonder how much pollution renaults batteries do (made in france) compared to those made in asia

[–] blah3166@piefed.social 14 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I keep hearing this and the opposite

Any sources I can read?

[–] Palerider@feddit.uk 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Yeah, they're all over Facebook!

/s

[–] YaksDC@sh.itjust.works 0 points 23 hours ago (1 children)
[–] blah3166@piefed.social 1 points 14 hours ago

Nowhere in that article does it state or even hint that ICE vehicles pollute less or are more efficient than EV's or even PHEV's. If I missed something, feel free to link directly to the line/paragraph, by selecting the text and clicking "Copy link to highlight": Example:

In most locations, BEVs save 40%–60% of emissions compared to ICEVs, though these values can vary substantially at the extremes (0–4700 kgCO2eq yr−1 or 0%–82%).

[–] Asetru@feddit.org 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I keep hearing this and the opposite

I never heard the opposite. Sources?

[–] stankmut@lemmy.world 4 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (2 children)

I'm surprised you haven't heard the opposite. It's wrong, but a really common talking point for a while was buying an EV wasn't actually good because of the pollution involved in manufacturing the car. Then a few years later they updated the rhetoric to talk about the minerals mined for batteries. I assume it was pushed by Fossil Fuel companies.

This The Guardian article mentions the minerals one. You can see an example of The Daily Telegraph pushing the myths with the headline: "Electric cars are made of pollution and human misery."

[–] Asetru@feddit.org 3 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

But the guardian article mentions the points but comes to exactly the expected conclusion:

The data we have leaves little doubt that resource extraction will be significantly lower for electric cars compared with their petrol or diesel equivalents as recycling increases.

[–] stankmut@lemmy.world 1 points 14 hours ago

Well yeah, it's a myth pushed by fossil fuel companies and climate change deniers. I was just saying I'm surprised you haven't anyone say it, it was the biggest 'gotcha' people would try to use when pushing back against EV adoption for years.

[–] ebc@lemmy.ca 1 points 19 hours ago

These figures are also heavily dependent on where and how the car was manufactured, too. If the factory is powered by clean energy, doesn't that reduce the amount of greenhouse gas emitted during manufacturing? If EV tech advances enough that the mining rigs are electric-powered, does that not also reduce the amount of GHG emitted mining lithium? Eventually we'll also have enough batteries to recycle that too (batteries are basically a very rich lithium ore), can't we do that in clean-powered factories?

Basically, I think the conversation on "how much manufacturing a given product pollutes" is entirely focused on the wrong thing...

Also, a lot of these studies compare an EV's complete lifecycle with just the tailpipe emissions of an ICEV. Mining, refining and transporting gasoline has a huge carbon impact before you even put it in the car.

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 2 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Batteries can have their materials 99.9% reclaimed. No need to keep mining after a certain point.

[–] Pieisawesome@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 13 hours ago

I’m not trying to inject FUD, but don’t some recycled materials wear out? I believe paper products do