this post was submitted on 20 Jun 2026
170 points (89.0% liked)

World News

56640 readers
2417 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Diurnambule@jlai.lu 8 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

Yeah, as long ng as the owner can find people to exploit. Again the solution is solidarity against the exploiters.. Whichever form is chosen.

[–] MnemonicBump@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

You're making a philosophical argument based on principles, the other person is making a practical argument based on ethics. Neither one of you are even responding to each other.

[–] Diurnambule@jlai.lu 2 points 47 minutes ago

What do you mean atn ethic decision ? You mean short terme gain ? How is it ethic to encourage the crushing machine to continue it's crushing ? What would happen if these people just decided to say no. We want real pay or you dress your table alone. The fragile employer would be desperate... The timing is just right for this kind of action. But hey let's discourage them with doomerisme.

[–] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz -1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Depriving workers of wages isn't solidarity, you're just being an asshole individually.

[–] 0x0@infosec.pub 4 points 1 hour ago (2 children)

It has to start somewhere.

I know you're basically allergic to them, but have you heard about unions?

[–] MrShankles@reddthat.com 2 points 1 hour ago

Don't eat at restaurants that exploit their workers?

[–] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 1 points 1 hour ago (2 children)

Do you think customers being assholes is a step towards unionization? That you're making people choose between food and rent out of solidarity with them?

[–] Diurnambule@jlai.lu 4 points 50 minutes ago

Do you think customer subsiding employer salary is a step in which direction I am curious ? Why not just let it fail instead of counting on people to again, split the loss and the business take the gain, it worked so well the last thousand of time it was done. Look where we are, people are complaining because other people are not paying a share the employer should have paid...

[–] 0x0@infosec.pub 3 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Do you think employers actually paying wage is a step anywhere at all in the process? No? Ok cool bub

[–] Diurnambule@jlai.lu 1 points 34 minutes ago

Americans are so tame that crazy. These guy keep trying to send an image of power but they are submisive like crazy. Their élit fucked them so hard they have daddy issue now...