this post was submitted on 25 Jun 2026
1643 points (98.0% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

40489 readers
4054 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BluJay320@lemmy.blahaj.zone 159 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Also 50, 70, and 100 year sentences for people who were protesting against ICE in Texas

[–] grandma@sh.itjust.works 4 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Wow this completely flew under my radar wtaf

[–] Nonconfrontational@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 hours ago

How is this surprising to you, grandma? America does American thing American-ly.

[–] brezel@piefed.social 13 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

the US is now soviet russia. the whole western world is sad :/

[–] Nonconfrontational@lemmy.ml 30 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

The US has more prisoners than any country to ever exist. You've been worse than the soviet union for basically all of your history in those regards.

Edit: Plus it's baked into your constitution that those prisoners are perfect for slavery. You never stopped using slave labor in the entire 250 year history of America.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

At least Soviet Russia wasn't run by a handful of billionaires

[–] brezel@piefed.social 2 points 11 hours ago
[–] D_C@sh.itjust.works 40 points 1 day ago (6 children)

What are the chances that these people will get pardoned, etc, when(if) normality returns?

Also what's the chances that the judge who handed down these long and unfair sentences will get any repercussions for being so obviously corrupt?

[–] sudoer777@lemmy.ml 9 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

Sanders joined ABC News’s “This Week,” where host Jonathan Karl asked if there was anything Trump has done right.

“I think cracking down on fentanyl, making sure our borders are stronger,” Sanders replied. “Look, nobody thinks illegal immigration is appropriate, and I happen to think we need comprehensive immigration reform, but I don’t think it’s appropriate for people to be coming across the border illegally.”

While the senator agreed with Trump on strengthening the country’s borders to protect citizens, he disagreed with the president’s mass deportation plan.

“He wants to deport 20 million people who are in this country who are undocumented,” Sanders said. “Well, you do that, you destroy the entire country.”

“Because I got news for you, Trump’s billionaire friends are not going to pick the crops in California that feed us. They’re not going to work in meatpacking houses,” he continued. “That’s what undocumented people are doing.”

Given that this is as far left as US politicians get, I'd say unlikely.

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 4 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

"We need those slaves to be working in conditions so abysmal, even our own disposables won't work them!"

[–] Nonconfrontational@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 hours ago
[–] NikkiDimes@lemmy.world -1 points 14 hours ago (3 children)

...What's wrong with his position, exactly?

[–] Nonconfrontational@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 hours ago

You removed, or stupid?

[–] RichardNixos@lemmy.ml 5 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

"cracking down on fentanyl"

The War on Drugs is well-documented to be a racist pretext for mass incarceration and violation of 4th Amendment rights, etc., (see The New Jim Crow for example), so Sanders is either a useful idiot or complicit.

[–] NikkiDimes@lemmy.world 0 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

I mean, yeah, if you're punishing people for consuming the drugs directly, 100%. However, Trump's focus has been more on preventing fentanyl from entering the country.

Unfortunately, he's still an idiot since the US's own pharmaceutical companies are the primary culprit and he's just using Mexico as a scapegoat, so yeah, you're not wrong lol.

[–] athatet@lemmy.zip 7 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Because people are not ‘illegal’ for crossing an imaginary line on a map.

[–] NikkiDimes@lemmy.world -1 points 11 hours ago

Where did he call anyone 'illegal'?

[–] FiniteBanjo@feddit.online 4 points 13 hours ago

I don't think a President can pardon a state crime, so you need a blue Texas Governor for starters.

[–] sobchak@programming.dev 10 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Unlikely. The US executes people when there's so much new evidence after sentencing pointing toward them not being guilty that the original prosecutors plead for them to not execute. The Dem establishment's complaints against ICE are mostly just procedural; they just argue for things like more transparency for these detention centers, not their abolishment.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

The last time that a Democratic president was in office for a federal execution was Lyndon Johnson.

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 3 points 8 hours ago

Snarling wolves and smiling foxes.

[–] ReHomed@lemmy.cafe 41 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Honestly 50/50

You can't really bounce back from the bullshit that has just ensued immediately, it's also kinda apparent to your average leftist that the democratic party is kind spineless as fuck when it comes to the right, so to have judges IN TEXAS MIND YOU bounce back from their previous decisions? Not gonna be too easy

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 4 points 8 hours ago

it's also kinda apparent to your average leftist that the democratic party is ~~kind spineless~~ complicit as fuck when it comes to the right, so to have judges IN TEXAS MIND YOU bounce back from their previous decisions? Not gonna be too easy

[–] gmtom@lemmy.world 5 points 19 hours ago (3 children)

A full pardon? Maybe for some of them, especially the zine guy, but the guy who actually shot the cop, unlikely. No democrat would want the optics of that.

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 8 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

Cop shot first. The guy who shot him did so in community defense.

In fact that cop may have given the shooter's attorneys an argument to revisit Harlow v Fitzgerald, and hand the SCOTUS the full text of §1983. They were given, unknowingly, an illegally edited text in 1982 when Harlow v Fitzgerald established Qualified Immunity, which is illegal according to the full statute as recorded in the 1871 Congressional Record.

[–] ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online 11 points 18 hours ago

Even the cop shooter should be fully pardoned.

[–] humanamerican@lemmy.zip 3 points 14 hours ago

Gotta commute that absurd sentence tho

[–] arrow74@lemmy.zip 8 points 22 hours ago

I hope they stand a good chance for an appeal based on the jury selection fuckery