Not The Onion

21804 readers

1353 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

Links to news stories from...
...credible sources, with...
...their original headlines, that...
...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, ableist, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

kescusay@lemmy.world

690

Ford had to hire back former engineers to fix mistakes made by its automated systems (www.theverge.com)

submitted 17 hours ago by VetOfTheSeas@discuss.online to c/nottheonion@lemmy.world

75 comments fedilink hide all child comments

“Mistakenly, we thought that by just introducing artificial intelligence and adjusting the design requirements that we had, that that would produce a high-quality product,” said Charles Poon, VP of vehicle hardware engineering, in a briefing this week with reporters.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] kossa@feddit.org 1 points 2 hours ago

Yep. I realized that the best use case is just using a LLM as a supercharged StackOverflow, where answers are based on my specific problem.

I just use it as chat, have it configured to give me at least two options as answer, better three. Then I feel still in charge. And if I like a proposed solution I only take it over line by line and tweak it to my liking. So I still "wrote" the code and would rightfully feel responsible for the result (again, like I used StackOverflow).

Never ever would I let it go rampage as agent on my codebase. That's terrible 😱.