this post was submitted on 26 Jun 2026
370 points (97.0% liked)

World News

56761 readers
1927 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] PM_me_your_doggo@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)

it lacks access to the sea

Wow, that's a bold statement.

[–] krashmo@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (5 children)

I think dumb is a better word. Russia has a crazy amount of coastlines.

[–] rainwall@piefed.social 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Frozen, tundra coastlines. It lacks warm water ports, which is why it invaded Ukraine for Crimea in 2014.

The UK on the other hand is nothing but warm water ports. I think their point stands for at least modern Russia.

[–] Archer@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

The UK on the other hand is nothing but warm water ports.

Right up until the AMOC collapses

[–] SreudianFlip@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago

The arctic does not free Russia from being a continental, rather than maritime, power. Their geopolitics and imperial identity is dominated by mountain and river and plains borders, and destabilizing or annexing the powers at their borders. The arctic is inaccessible except for some baltic access dominated by maritime nations.

[–] Jiral@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

It is way less dumb than you think it is. As long as climate change is not doing something about it, Russia's access to international waters is a lot more compromised than many think. Russia's main ports have access to the Baltic Sea and the Black Sea. In both cases other countries can block access of Russian ships to the Atlantic. Other than that, the only ports with all year round usable access to international waters is in Russia's far east (Vladivostok primarily), which can compensate a bit but not nearly replace the ports in the European parts of Russia.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago

I think what they're really trying to talk about are port cities. That's where mingling and cultural exchange happen. Also lively bar scenes.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

But in relation to this statement, it is not wrong. The large coastline in the north does not really provide contacts except for polar bears, the east is a completely different society, which leaves only the Baltic coast and a few, summer-only harbors in the north and the black sea.