this post was submitted on 09 May 2025
335 points (98.0% liked)

politics

31079 readers
19 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

FBI Director Kash Patel, appointed by Donald Trump despite lacking law enforcement experience, has frustrated current and former FBI and DOJ officials with what they see as a lack of seriousness and professionalism.

Patel skipped or scaled back key briefings and ended routine field office meetings, citing leaks.

Critics cite a leadership void, public relations stunts, and excessive travel including multiple trips unrelated to work.

Patel also briefly led the ATF but was quietly replaced after being absent.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 68 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Everything they've done since Jan makes sense when viewed from the perspective that they never plan on facing consequences, accountability, or fair elections ever again.

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

All the evidence I've seen to date is shaky at best. The strongest evidence is how brazenly they have acted since taking office, indicating the type of confidence you'd expect after already successfully subverting democracy, but they've been already successfully subverted democracy for decades with the endless stream of disinformation and propaganda... I still haven't recovered from the migrant caravans or Obamas tan suit.

[–] redsand@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Russia hacked in multiple times, mapped things out and coordinated attacks in swing states. Defcon started doing a whole village for voting machines after the first time and very few municipalities fixed anything. There still hasn't been a legitimate recount anywhere there should have been.

[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oh I'm well aware. I've read dozens of articles over 2 decades about the horrors of American e-voting. Every election since their intro could have already been used for fraud at some level, all the way to federal.

The problem is that there isn't some smoking gun to prove it, and there probably never will be. It's better to focus on the anti-democratic flaws in the entire system, especially oligarch/corporate control over politics through bribery — sorry, "donations" — and all other forms of corruption. Those are already proven.

[–] redsand@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago

I think what we really need, short of direct action, is journalism. Journalists could find a smoking gun. There should be several. There should be physical ballots, records of destruction or missing ballots.

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Read the first and last link. The Russian Tail is obvious. There's your smoking guns.

[–] kerntucky@infosec.pub 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I would but I've never heard of either of those sources. Do you have any reputable sources? I would love to have some ammo to use against some MAGA relatives.

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The first one is a newspaper in San Diego I believe the author linked the academic sources in the article, and the last link is a non profit foundation that was set up by a cybersecurity veteran, a data analyst, and a third academic. I don't know how to give you better sources than that.

MSM isn't going to breathe a word of this. They'll get taken off the air.

[–] AFKBRBChocolate@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Everything also makes sense if viewed from the point of view of benefiting Russia.

[–] barneypiccolo@lemm.ee 9 points 1 year ago

Its not tin-foil hat, it's Putin. Its always Putin, using Skum and HitlerPig as his muscle.

When will people truly internalize that the two biggest foreign Sociopathic Oligarchs, have partnered up with the most prolific traitor in American history? None of them have any loyalty or patriotism toward America, and only see us as a big, rich, fat, lazy target to be ruthlessly exploited and looted, and it's happening in real time before our eyes.

All they care about is money, and either Putin is paying them directly out of the Russian Treasury (HitlerPig would rape and murder his own mother for far less than a billion bucks, and Putin could order a lot more than that), or they've cut a deal to split the booty like the pirates they are.

[–] WadeTheWizard@fedia.io 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Unless he and his cronies are also bullet proof, stab proof, immune to poison, immune to radiation, and possess no flammable property, that doesn't seem like a very good plan.

[–] chaogomu@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

They think that when the revolution hits, they can use Peter Theil's spy tech to crush it, and then they will go full mask off.