this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2026
56 points (78.6% liked)

Ye Power Trippin' Bastards

1793 readers
76 users here now

This is a community in the spirit of "Am I The Asshole" where people can post their own bans from lemmy or reddit or whatever and get some feedback from others whether the ban was justified or not.

Sometimes one just wants to be able to challenge the arguments some mod made and this could be the place for that.


Posting Guidelines

All posts should follow this basic structure:

  1. Which mods/admins were being Power Tripping Bastards?
  2. What sanction did they impose (e.g. community ban, instance ban, removed comment)?
  3. Provide a screenshot of the relevant modlog entry (don’t de-obfuscate mod names).
  4. Provide a screenshot and explanation of the cause of the sanction (e.g. the post/comment that was removed, or got you banned).
  5. Explain why you think its unfair and how you would like the situation to be remedied.

Rules


Expect to receive feedback about your posts, they might even be negative.

Make sure you follow this instance's code of conduct. In other words we won't allow bellyaching about being sanctioned for hate speech or bigotry.

YPTB matrix channel: For real-time discussions about bastards or to appeal mod actions in YPTB itself.


Some acronyms you might see.


Relevant comms

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

So I posted an article from al Arabiya about Christian villages denying that they asked Netanyahu to annex their villages on World News@lemmy.world.

Jordanlund removed it simply because he don't like the source. Yet he has no problem with articles from Saudi backed Iranian media https://irannewswire.org/ that also celebrate the terrorist group the MEK that sell out their country to side with Saddam and has no problem with israeli sources that deny the obvious genocide.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] mrdown@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Name those people. Your sources doesn't have any evidence of biases towards lebanon

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world -3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Ground News for one, as previously noted:

https://ground.news/interest/iran-news-wire

"The Ground News media bias check for Iran News Wire is unknown. Scores are assigned by aggregating bias scores from Ad Fontes Media, Media Bias/Fact Check, and AllSides.

Is Iran News Wire credible or reliable? Our Factuality score answers both of those questions. When it comes to Iran News Wire, we’ve assigned a Unknown factuality rating. Ratings are assigned by aggregating scores from Ad Fontes Media and Media Bias/Fact Check."

[–] mrdown@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 days ago (2 children)

What a stupid dogmatic person you are

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 6 points 2 days ago (2 children)

No. He knows fully well what he's doing. Dogmatic, yes.

Yup, he's a well known troll. Kind of surprising dbzer0 hasn't booted him yet. I've seen people booted for less severe but still liberal apologia.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world -4 points 2 days ago

Making sure bullshit sources get removed when reported? Yup! Guilty!

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world -5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It's not dogma when I show you to be wrong over and over and over again.

I gave you repeated chances to use better sources, you not only refused, you doubled down in PMs.

Good riddance, don't let the door hit you in the ass on the way out!

[–] mrdown@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It is dogma to take fact checkers at face values whrn we ask you to use your brain and your own judgment you can't do it. I showed you how the source are sympatic to traitors and terrorists and you simply ignored it

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world -2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Because, again, you're trying to lie your way in to being allowed to use inherently invalid sources.

Think of it like this:

You find a REALLY juicy story and you REALLY want to post it... But the only source is The New York Post.

Are you going to post it anyway and then argue like a little bitch when it gets removed?

Or, OR would you rather go "Hmm... Seems too good to be true, lets see who else is covering this..." and submit that instead.

Particularly when a mod tells you "No, not that source, try again."

The story carries way more weight coming from a legitimate source than a fantasy source and if the goal is to get the story noticed and accepted, which should be what EVERYONE wants, you, me, and everyone else in the community.

You do not want the reaction of "Yeah, but it's a bullshit site."

You would rather force your agenda, have it get removed when it breaks the rules of the community, and then argue over simply finding a better source.

Because finding a better source doesn't fit your agenda. 😉

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Are you going to post it anyway and then argue like a little bitch when it gets removed?

Jordan, your shadow shows to everyone but you. I'd hope having had a close call with ending, I'd focus on making peace with my schismed self, rather than power tripping on the internet, to keep from facing myself and my mortality.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world -1 points 1 day ago

Enforcing the rules when idiots want to break them unfettered is not power tripping, it's what mods are supposed to do.