this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2026
76 points (94.2% liked)

World News

57010 readers
1799 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Volkswagen is trying to implement a comprehensive cost-cutting programme with up to 100,000 job losses, double the amount previously planned, by 2030 and the potential contraction or closure of several plants.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] robomuffin79@lemmy.world 44 points 1 day ago (2 children)

But this is capitalism. If German manufacturers can’t compete, they should shut down. Survival of the fittest and free-markets etc etc. there will be job losses but the German people should ask their leaders why that happened

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 0 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

A fair argument can be made that the Chinese government considers EV an imperative and interferes and subsidizes, so it's not fully free market. Thus any country with industry competing with China needs to decide if they care and if they care, how to respond to advantage conferred by China government policies. Whether that's similar incentives for their domestic industry and/or tariffs to try to level the playing field.

[–] kossa@feddit.org 2 points 7 hours ago

Volkswagen was a state funded company until the sixties ¯\_(ツ)_/¯.

New factories, battery research and stuff like that are heavily subsidized for German car makers as well.

Maybe China is subsidizing more, but maybe that only speaks for sound economic decisions in China, like

A. they have the money, apparently

B. they subsidize future technologies instead of fabulating about e-fuels and whatnot.

[–] b161@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Exactly. They insisted China become capitalist then complain when they do capitalism.

[–] timbuck2themoon@sh.itjust.works 7 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

Article doesn't really point to Chinese vehicles being the primary reason though- it's that demand is down for cars in Europe.

That said, it's not really free market capitalist anyway for China to heavily subsidize EV production.

[–] CommanderCloon@lemmy.ml 2 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Chinese car makers aren't really more subsidized than Europeans and US. Actually we're only seeing the brands that survived the internal competition of the Chinese car market, where a ton of brands failed and died.

What we're seeing are the brands that survived that competition through extreme optimization, at a level no other car manufacturer had to reach before. And they did that in a growing market of 1.5 billion people.

Why should they struggle when competing with an aging industry with aging production modes that only address ~600m people? Especially when those companies offer objectively worse products at worse prices?

[–] timbuck2themoon@sh.itjust.works 1 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

"Objectively"

And just because China had companies go under doesn't mean they aren't still subsidized to the hilt.

I do enjoy though people that are normally pro Union, pro worker, etc. essentially arguing that these people's jobs don't matter and we'll take subsidized foreign cars just because they're cheaper.

[–] qevlarr@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago

You think European car brands aren't subsidized?

And this has nothing to do with struggling European car brands? https://www.reuters.com/business/autos-transportation/eu-relent-combustion-engines-ban-after-auto-industry-pressure-2025-12-16/

[–] Ilixtze@lemmy.ml 2 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Lol you speak as if teslas haven't been heavily subsidized for decades. The difference is that chinese ev's are cheaper and deliver good quality.

[–] timbuck2themoon@sh.itjust.works 1 points 11 hours ago

Teslas are American and of course have been subsidized. But the article is about Volkswagen and German companies...