this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2026
212 points (95.3% liked)
Linux
14281 readers
305 users here now
A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system (except the memes!)
Also, check out:
Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
If your distro is forcing you to use more than one package manager on a regular basis, you need to switch distros.
If you're choosing to use 3-4 package managers simultaneously, even though you don't really need to, that's on you.
Either way, it isn't Linux's fault.
I would gladly use only one package manager, but different applications offer different types of downloads. Do this for 30 applications, and you will probably need 3-4 package managers or install methods that do not auto update. Example:
My distro's package manager will quite happily install all of those. From the main distro repo, even. I don't see any reason why I would mess around with flatpaks or other distribution methods.
I can literally count on one hand the pieces of non-game software I use that are installed from outside my distro's package manager (there's three if you include the inkscape plugin to drive my vinyl cutter).
So I repeat, this is either a distro issue or related to how you, personally, prefer to manage your system. It is not a general Linux issue.