this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2026
212 points (95.3% liked)

Linux

14281 readers
296 users here now

A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system (except the memes!)

Also, check out:

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] merdaverse@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I would gladly use only one package manager, but different applications offer different types of downloads. Do this for 30 applications, and you will probably need 3-4 package managers or install methods that do not auto update. Example:

  • Firefox: ppa, because that has always been the fastest and most convenient
  • Krita: flatpak, since the others suck
  • Qbittorrent: only AppImage
  • Godot: native executable
[–] nyan@lemmy.cafe 3 points 1 day ago

My distro's package manager will quite happily install all of those. From the main distro repo, even. I don't see any reason why I would mess around with flatpaks or other distribution methods.

I can literally count on one hand the pieces of non-game software I use that are installed from outside my distro's package manager (there's three if you include the inkscape plugin to drive my vinyl cutter).

So I repeat, this is either a distro issue or related to how you, personally, prefer to manage your system. It is not a general Linux issue.