this post was submitted on 11 Jul 2026
374 points (99.0% liked)

World News

57018 readers
2385 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/49310400

Alabama Republican voters and politicians meanwhile:

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] blitzen@lemmy.ca 52 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (4 children)

Californian here, and I would agree that US-CA isn’t really the problem that, say, Kentucky is and that’s why the bourbon boycott is effective. But, hurt US-CA and you’re hurting the US, so I support that. And the elephant in the room is that are more Republicans in US-CA than any other state, and I’d wager a high percentage of winery owners skew Republican.

It’s a shame, but the boycott is warranted. I just hope that when we get back to sane times, other countries remember that California largely tries to do the right thing. The way you look at the US, us Californians look at the rest of the US the same way.

[–] CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

I would agree that CA isn’t really the problem

hurt CA and you’re hurting the US

Republicans in CA

I just want to point out that in the context of multiple countries, "CA" would refer to Canada, as it's literally the worldwide recognized 2-letter ISO-3166 country code.

And yes, while most people would understand what is meant from the context, using US defaultism in a thread about another country boycotting US American products kinda bumps.

[–] blitzen@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

That is an extremely good point, and does expose my bias (I live in California, but ironically dual Canadian citizen). I'll lightly edit the comment using the ISO-3166 code for California (respectfully for you, because as much of a fan of ISO standards as I am, I'd not heard of 3166. Thanks).

[–] NottaLottaOcelot@lemmy.ca 3 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Right, because the trouble is that boycotts become meaningless when you start trying to justify buying from certain states (no state is homogenous) or by C-suite political support (also not homogenous). At the end of the day, the tax money all funds a government that threatens Canada with economic warfare and annexation. I hope US businesses run by good people do well, but right now it has to be Americans themselves who support them.

[–] blitzen@lemmy.ca 1 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

You seem to be under the impression that I do not support Canadas boycott. I do. Re-read my comment.

[–] venusaur@lemmy.world 19 points 23 hours ago

Yeah all those winery owners are rich conservatives

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 8 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

CA isn’t really the problem that, say, Kentucky is

Reactionaries in California outnumber reactionaries in Kentucky 10:1

[–] blitzen@lemmy.ca 6 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

And sane people outnumber "reactionaries"/republicans. Your point?

You're willfully ignorant if you think the average California voter does more harm than the harmful Kentucky voter. See Mitch McConnell. Credit where due, however, their governor is pretty good.

All of that isn't to say I object to the boycott. I most certainly do not.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

You’re willfully ignorant if you think the average California voter does more harm than the harmful Kentucky voter

I've seen enough evidence to believe Gavin Newsom and Dianne Feinstein have committed atrocities. Nevermind Kamala Harris.

[–] blitzen@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 hours ago

"Atrocities", really? Did you bring that evidence to share with the class?

[–] BigJohnnyHines@lemmy.ca 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Is it really that simple when the technology companies that have enabled all of this the most have been most supported by and enabled by California. I agree that the average persons worldview is much healthier in California but none of this is likely to have happened without the dominant social platforms and data collection of American tech.

[–] blitzen@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

That's capitalism, baby. And I hate it too.