this post was submitted on 18 Jul 2026
695 points (97.9% liked)

pics

29329 readers
263 users here now

Rules:

1.. Please mark original photos with [OC] in the title if you're the photographer

2..Pictures containing a politician from any country or planet are prohibited, this is a community voted on rule.

3.. Image must be a photograph, no AI or digital art.

4.. No NSFW/Cosplay/Spam/Trolling images.

5.. Be civil. No racism or bigotry.

Photo of the Week Rule(s):

1.. On Fridays, the most upvoted original, marked [OC], photo posted between Friday and Thursday will be the next week's banner and featured photo.

2.. The weekly photos will be saved for an end of the year run off.

Weeks 2023

Instance-wide rules always apply. https://mastodon.world/about

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I'm only half kidding. I'm a bit of a prepper and I have lots of powerbanks and devices that charge from USB but besides idling my truck I really had no other way to charge any of them in case of a long-term power outage which seemed a bit of an oversight on my part.

Not like this solves the issue. 30 watts (under ideal conditions) isn't much but it's a start.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] kernelle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 30 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Also be careful storing powerbanks at full charge, charge them at 80% or ideally around half for maximum longevity

[–] ladicius@lemmy.world 22 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Also don't charge devices directly from solar power because voltage changes drastically due to sun movement and clouds. Better load a power bank and use that to charge the other devices as power banks are much more resilient to changing voltages.

[–] Dookieman12@piefed.social 16 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

don’t charge devices directly from solar power

Unless your power bank has a built in charge controller, this should also include your power bank. At its core, a power bank is nothing more than a big ass lithium ion (or maybe potassium ion, if it's newer) battery, just like the one in any other device.

[–] huquad@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)
[–] ede@lemmy.ml 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

You're saying I can ditch the lemons and power my potato with bananas?

[–] huquad@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 weeks ago

You're better off using the bananas as nuclear fuel. I hear they're radioactive

[–] Dookieman12@piefed.social 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Indeed. They're all the rage in China right now (I AM NOT A TANKIE). Some are predicting they're the "next generation" of battery technology.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Potassium-ion_battery

[–] Sustolic@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Errr I am pretty sure those are currently only in use in prototyping and research, did you mean a different battery technology?

[–] Dookieman12@piefed.social 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Yeah, I think I meant Sodium-ion

[–] huquad@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

That makes more sense. I'm still skeptical. Sodium ion is being sold as safer than lithium ion, but I just read a paper that shows its still worse than LFP. time will tell

[–] dreugeworst@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 weeks ago

current sodium ion tech is great for stationary use and for cold climates. beyond that, lithium ion will be more useful

[–] gandalf_der_12te@feddit.org 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

potassium ion, if it’s newer

i think you mean sodium ion?

[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It also saves a lot of money to do this. I've found it takes almost as much power to go from 80 to 100 as it does to go from 0 to 80.

[–] krisevol@lemmus.org 14 points 2 weeks ago

It doesn't. It takes longer to charge to 100, but the efficiency is basically the same. The amp draw drops after 80%. If you are using a engine to charge, you would lose efficiency because of the extra time, but using solar wouldn't have this issue.