this post was submitted on 20 Jul 2026
1269 points (97.5% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

40951 readers
4768 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] tetris11@feddit.uk 75 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (8 children)

There's a scene in one of the DC movies where a german sniper is hiding ontop of a church in a french village

Ever the pillar of restraint and decorum, Wonder Woman takes down the entire fucking church to kill this one soldier.

It's a scene so over the top with needless destruction of a beautiful historical landmark, and you wonder what the filmmakers were trying to say with it.

Edit: https://youtu.be/BWuafJtMrBE&t=195

[–] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 20 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

This is pretty silly. Superhero movies constantly feature superheroes and supervillains causing mass property damage. Superman will be thrown through buildings. Cars will be used as throwing weapons, etc.

It's a deliberate cinematic choice. Superheroes just flying in the sky punching each other doesn't convey the power involved in these characters. No, if you want to portray superheroes in a way that actually feels real to people, you need to show them interacting with our ordinary world. You show them treating things we experience as solid, indestructible, and immobile as mere tissue paper.

This is just "show, don't tell." Sure, you could have some character verbally explain that "Superman has the strength of a million men!", but if all you saw was Superman fighting in a cloud or an empty field, that wouldn't really mean much. You can't feel it. Watch Superman casually pick up a skyscraper, and suddenly your mind can actually grasp the scale of his power.

[–] tetris11@feddit.uk 1 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

I hear you whilst defending superman in the sense that, he's either chucked through a populated building against his will to highlight the monstrosity of his assailants, or he chucks buildings with the implication that they're empty.

In this WW scene, it's shown to be a populated church. It just rings odd for me w.r.t to these unwritten rules of hollywood destruction that Im hyperfixated on

[–] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 4 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Populated by a soldier, in a war zone. This wasn't a puppy and kitten caretaker nunnery on cute orphans visiting day.

[–] tetris11@feddit.uk -1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

she's an immortal goddess, who shouldn't relish in the destruction of mortals who were handed a gun at a young age and pushed to a front line for a creed they likely don't give two actual shits about

[–] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 5 points 4 hours ago

she's an immortal goddess

Something she didn't know at the time. Also, rather a lot of her training was in how to wage war.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 30 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

and you wonder what the filmmakers were trying to say with it

No deeper meaning, just action.

[–] tetris11@feddit.uk 0 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Then put a whole battalion up there or something, make it clear that she cleared out a whole sniper nest, not just one guy

[–] lambisio@feddit.cl 1 points 9 hours ago

They already had that scene three minutes earlier into the movie, and unfortunately execs think that if you repeat something then you lose interest from your audience and thus can lose shekels.

Curiously enough, "repeating plot points and previous information that can be inferred without being told" is exempted from this issue, so there we go, characters re-explaining obvious plot points at every turn.

[–] toddestan@lemmy.world 8 points 19 hours ago

I doubt much more thought was put into this other than "hey, you know what would look cool?"

[–] Kaligalis@lemmy.world 56 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Hollywood is fully integrated into the military-industrial complex. Inflicting disproportional damage on the population of whoever the enemy is is how The Great US Empire wages war. So that is what the population at home is meant to support. So that is what is shown to the young, easy to influence generations.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 7 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

i mean they are the copaganda/militaryganda arm of the MIC. Transformers is pretty much all militaryganda and very little actual robots action.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 6 points 17 hours ago

it's also one percent robot testicles

[–] tetris11@feddit.uk 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I know. It is indeed a wonder when a film like Parasite slips under their radar, and they suddenly have to scramble to make sure the director doesn't get too direct with their messaging in their next film

[–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

They make one movie with easy to digest anti-elite themes for every dozen that promotes competition between the working class, has libertarian undertones, or otherwise reinforces the status quo. How many Hollywood heroes promote the status quo vs challenge the status quo?

Also, Parasite is a South Korean movie, which makes it even weirder. SK is way deeper in late stage capitalism than the US if you can believe it. When Samsung alone accounts for 23% of their gdp, something's wrong.

[–] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Indeed, Hollywood make the directors of the "Wochenschau" (june 1940 to March 1945) look like kindergartners and they learned from them too.

[–] Katana314@lemmy.world 25 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I mean, the easy answer is all Hollywood action movies contain gratuitous destruction for the sake of visual interest.

It was honestly my first thought as a kid: “Oh my god! That guy’s food stall was completely destroyed by that car! What will he do now? Is there anyone he can call to get it replaced?”

The simpler answer is to accept cinema violence is a childish thoughtless moment anyway, and we shouldn’t compare it too much to real life. But in Gadot’s case, I suppose gratuitous destruction fits very much with her home country’s philosophy.

[–] The_Decryptor@aussie.zone 12 points 1 day ago

I think that's the one thing they got right unfortunately, in real life armies (usually) don't risk soldiers trying to locate and kill a sniper, they just use things like artillery, missiles, or tanks.

[–] HCSOThrowaway@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

"Sometimes a cigar is just a cigar."

But as I'm learning lately as I get settled in on Lemmy, some people here will take any opportunity to stretch things to their soapbox.

Now if you'll excuse me, I'm off to defend myself against the accusation from a mod that I'm anti-socialist because I said the USSR wasn't perfect.

[–] MrShankles@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)
[–] marcos@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

One should not ever wonder what the writers of Wonder Woman movies were thinking.

If that one is what bothering you, consider yourself lucky and move on.

[–] InFerNo@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

lmao the Flemish at the end caught me off guard 😂

"Edde da gezien?"

[–] tetris11@feddit.uk 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I thought it was hochdeutsch -- "Hast du dass gesehen?"

[–] InFerNo@lemmy.ml 2 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

If you enable the subtitles, it says Flemish.

Took another listen:

"Hebde da gezien"

"Wa is er gebeurd?"

"Hebde da gezien, wa zij gedaan heeft?"

It's perfect dialect, which surprises me, but after this it seems to devolve into gibberish. I can't make too much out of it, besides French being thrown in, which for our country is, again, spot on, since we are divided bilingually.

"Veld" also means "field". it's such a generic name to give a town, but plausible.