this post was submitted on 20 Jul 2026
49 points (94.5% liked)
Asklemmy
54967 readers
479 users here now
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
Search asklemmy ๐
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
- Lemmyverse: community search
- sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
- !lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~
founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Why is it wrong to be the smartest person?
Because I know how much of a dumbass I am. If Iโm the smartest, the room is full of complete fucking idiots.
I would be rather smart than being an idiot.
Because you'll be unable to learn anything. You'll eventually get dumber.
I don't think so. A smart person can still learn while being the smartest in the room. People don't get dumber, just because they are the smartest of all in the room. In fact you might be able to help others, or be the only one who can solve the problem. Then you are the right person in the room.
On the other hand, being dumb or an idiot does not mean you will learn... most likely you will not (that's why its called an idiot). Smart people can be an asshole or you cannot keep up with them and just be a burden.
Teaching others is one of the best ways to learn. There are levels of hell though. E.g. try teaching MAGA anything about the scientific method.