I've been both on different uni projects. Far better being the smart one in a group of idiots and just banging out the work without interference for a good grade. Being the idiot on the smart team was torture.
Asklemmy
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
- Lemmyverse: community search
- sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
- !lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~
So long as the intelligent people are also kind. A group of intelligent people that are backbiting and cruel is the absolute worst.
Idiot in a team of smart people, so I can learn from them.
If you're the smartest person in the room, you're in the wrong room.
If you're the dumbest person in the room, are you in the right room?
Why is it wrong to be the smartest person?
Because I know how much of a dumbass I am. If I’m the smartest, the room is full of complete fucking idiots.
I would be rather smart than being an idiot.
Because you'll be unable to learn anything. You'll eventually get dumber.
I don't think so. A smart person can still learn while being the smartest in the room. People don't get dumber, just because they are the smartest of all in the room. In fact you might be able to help others, or be the only one who can solve the problem. Then you are the right person in the room.
On the other hand, being dumb or an idiot does not mean you will learn... most likely you will not (that's why its called an idiot). Smart people can be an asshole or you cannot keep up with them and just be a burden.
Teaching others is one of the best ways to learn. There are levels of hell though. E.g. try teaching MAGA anything about the scientific method.
"idiot" and "intelligent" are not mutually exclusive. One can be both at the same time. There are intelligent people doing idiotic stuff.
Um, yes.
I'm going to have to choose to be the intelligent person. You might think the idiot has it easy...they may even not know they are an idiot. But they could be so stupid they also think all the intelligent people are idiots, so they might get all the frustration of thinking they are the intelligent person on a team of idiots while actually being the opposite.
Idiot on a team of intelligent people. I get pissed off at people being stupid. My team might get pissed off at me but that's their problem. And generally I like being around people smarter than me because I learn a lot from them.
It's amazing how many choose to be an idiot.
Ignorance truly is bliss in a lot of situations
And I might learn some new things. Being the least intelligent person in a group doesn’t mean being stupid.
Idiot on a team of intelligent people. Hopefully, they'll put up with me long enough to point where I learn enough to stop being an idiot.
Congratulations on your new position in management.
I’d argue that management is simply a different skill. And the reason so many managers are bad is because they were promoted from roles that didn’t previously require management experience.
Let’s say you hire someone to bolt things together on an assembly line, and then three years later they’re managing projects (without ever having gone to school in those interim years to learn any management skills). Yeah, they’ll probably be a fucking awful project manager. Unless they’re naturally gifted at management and really good at thinking on their feet, they’ll be flying by the seat of their pants. They’ll be using a ton of maladaptive tactics that were developed for surviving, not thriving. Because their original skill set and experience wasn’t based in project management, and they haven’t done anything to further their managerial skills.
It’s the old “if you judge a fish by its ability to fly” quote, except that fish keep getting hired because they’re good swimmers, and then they get promoted into positions where they’re expected to fly.
I fucking wish.
To be the inteligent person in a team of idiots is certainly one of the worst things that could happen to you.
That depends, if one of the idiots is in charge, it's torture. However, if you don't have to answer to any of them, you can set them up with busy work to feel important and do all the actual work yourself. Then it's only bad if you don't like the work.
Ignorance is bliss. Besides, it's usually the idiots who get promoted.
Idiot on the team of intelligent people. I'd rather just be responsible for educating myself and not everybody else.
There is nothing worse than working for an idiot.
Working for an idiot with peers that are his fellow idiots. Definitely worse than just working for an idiot.
OMG YES!!!
That chorus of dumbfucks that just reenforce the idiocy....
If the smart people are nice, I'd be ok being the idiot. Still might feel a little bad over not being able to help. Maybe I'll be the cheerleader. "Go team! Hell yeah! Crunch those numbers!"
I'll bring snacks?
Depends what the team is doing. If it’s a marathon running team for charity, or a team of people picking up garbage on a beach, it probably doesn’t matter much.
In my early career I made a bit of a niche for myself being the idiot on a team of very smart people. My job was to ask the simple question that none of them considered before it was too late.
If I'm the smart one, I have to do all the work I can't trust to idiots, run the team or be on a team run by an idiot, be the most responsible according to any outside observer, and my success will still be mostly reliant on idiots.
If I'm the idiot, at worst I'd be mocked, but maybe I'd be too stupid to notice. At least the work would be more likely to be successful.
I've gone being the smartest person in the room in my previous couple roles (mostly because I was the only person with any IT or platform knowledge, not because I'm some prodigy) to the bottom of the totem pole and well behind the intelligence of my current team since I changed careers.
It's wonderful having people around that are smarter than me that I can learn from and ask questions to. It's hard being the idiot on a team when you're trying to improve and care about your work. Working with idiots that don't care or seemingly never improve is the worst. I've learned more over the past 8 months than I have since I started my professional career.
I like the phrase, "Never be the smartest person in the room". Sometimes it happens, but in most situations, there is someone else that is more knowledgeable about something than you, and that's an opportunity to learn.
Do you continue being an idiot outside the context of the team?
I’d rather be surrounded by people more capable than me (at least if I care about the success of the task), but not at that cost.
U r idjut 4eva end errybody nose it
Sign me up. Being an idiot all the time for everything seems like such a good time.
Just kill me now.
It really depends on how interesting the people are and how good they are at storytelling. I've met super annoying smart people and really entertaining dumb people so it's not like intelligence is the determining factor.
I'd probably rather be hanging out with either the more interesting or more autistic group because I think we'd get along the best. If that makes me the idiot of the group, I don't think that's too bad of a deal.
being an idiot is the wise choice here, sometimes it is
I suppose it matters at which capacity you enjoy teaching, if they were interested in learning and happy then I guess it wouldn't be terrible, but in general with people it'll never be an ideal situation and I just don't want that kinda pressure
I am not a team player
When you say team of idiots, are these people that are just lazy, or don’t know how to do the work? I can work with people who want to do the right thing but lack experience and knowledge. But a team of people that are lazy and don’t care would be torture to work with so in that case ignorance is bliss.
Like they aren't capable of following instructions even if they wanted to
I think I could do that, assuming they want to. As frustrating as it is to be the smart person on a team of people who don’t know anything, if they at least care some then it’s not a total loss.
I'd rather be me