this post was submitted on 22 Jul 2026
917 points (93.5% liked)

memes

22032 readers
3491 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] DScratch@sh.itjust.works 7 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

So!

You might have some neurodivergence. I was diagnosed with ADHD (Inattentive-Moderate) and I recognise this situation.

You are happy and fulfilled by ‘parallel play’ where you are with someone but you are each doing your own thing.

It sounds like your partner is asking for dedicated quality time. With active interaction.

So here’s what you do: Buy LEGO.
Nothing major (at first). The Botanical sets are lovely. Then you pick an evening, put on some background music and sit across from each other building your own set and talking about stupid garbage.
Once you’re done, order some food in and cuddle on the couch with a comfy movie. (WALL-E, Spirited Away, Hot Fuzz. Something like that).

Maybe, if you’re a giga-chad, you sneak some fancy dessert into the house earlier in the day.

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Or... the partner could use their words, and describe, clearly, what qualifies as 'spending time together'.

Maybe they could do as you've done, and suggest some particular activities, that they would enjoy.

No one in a two party relationship needs to be neurodivergent... for two people to have different attachment styles, love languages, etc.

Also, is it up to member one of the relationship to... figure out what member two ... wants?

Why is member two not responsible for understanding themself to the point they can describe what they want in a meaningfully precise way?

Is... member two... cognitively impaired?

Too shy to ... communicate?

Then they shouldn't be in a relationship.

[–] Spot@startrek.website 6 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

I don't know why they downvotes. Parallel play isn't for everyone but it's a great idea to try, neurodivergent or not, to see if that satisfies both parties on feeling they spent some quality time together.

[–] TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world -3 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

down votes because armchair diagnosing people is an asshole move. it's shitty and awful and people need to stop doing it.

you cannot diagnose people based on internet comments. you know who diagnoses people? professional therapists and psychologists.

I was on a date last month with a woman who seemed nice, then she started armchair diagnosing me when I was talking about my hobbies. So I basically told her I had to go, because it was so incredibly rude and arrogant and I want nothing to do with someone uses therapy talk when they are not a professional. Not to mention, it's a violation of professional ethics for therapists to diagnoses people who they are in personal relationships with.

It's basically the equivalent of being like "oh I'm tired today", "Oh you must have cancer! let me tell you how you need to go on this diet to fight it!'

[–] Spot@startrek.website 6 points 9 hours ago

Ah, I see. It was only a "you might" so I suppose I didn’t quite see it as diagnosing they way I am used to seeing it done from other post experiences. But, understandable.