this post was submitted on 25 Jul 2026
1039 points (97.9% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

41064 readers
4716 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] IAMgROOT@lemmy.wtf 2 points 2 days ago (3 children)

a bacterium is not equivalent to a human being

[–] ExtremeDullard@piefed.social 13 points 2 days ago (1 children)

A non-viable fetus is not equivalent to a baby.

[–] IAMgROOT@lemmy.wtf -4 points 2 days ago (2 children)
[–] don@lemmy.ca 17 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Nonviable:

  1. Not capable of living or developing.
    ”a nonviable fetus.”
  2. Not workable or practicable.
    "a nonviable idea."
  3. Not viable: not capable of independent life; not practicable.

Source: The American Heritage Dictionary, 5th Edition

[–] IAMgROOT@lemmy.wtf -3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Thanks for the definition

I think abortion is wholly different from getting a nonviable fetus removed as it cannot develop nor live

[–] Hacksaw@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 days ago (2 children)

All fetuses are non-viable without being allowed parasitic access to the mother's bodily resources.

[–] NewSocialWhoDis@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 days ago

This is really the whole thing, regardless of how developed the baby is.

Imagine a fully formed child or adult with a liver problem. Science comes up with some way that someone of similar genetics can be physically connected to them and filter their blood for them and keep them alive while they wait for a transplant. Should the person who can physically sustain another person's body be legally required to do so?

So far, less invasive versions of this say no: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McFall_v._Shimp

You can't even force dead bodies to donate organs.

[–] IAMgROOT@lemmy.wtf -1 points 2 days ago (2 children)

all children are non viable without being allowed parasitic access to the parents resources

even the ones that are born

[–] Hacksaw@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That's stupid. We have foster systems, adoption, orphanages, children have even survived living in the wild or with wolves. There are many non parent ways for born children to survive.

God what a stupid, el obviously false statement. If you spent half the time thinking about it as you did typing it you would have deleted it in shame.

[–] IAMgROOT@lemmy.wtf 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

even in an orphanage, they have parasitic access to someone ELSE's resources, right?

a child cannot possibly live completely alone and independent from birth. You have a duty to care for him/her as you brought them into the world. Does that not also apply to children in the womb?

I wish you had dribbled down your mother's thigh

You're so boring

Non viable: adjective:

Fuck off

Pushing your stupid superstition ain't changing anyone's minds

[–] ickplant@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I am curious, how do you feel about IVF? Should infertile people get to do it? It destroys embryos in the process. And it’s “playing god.”

[–] imadethis@fedinsfw.app 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

As to the "playing god" thing, I was actually quite amazed at how touchy the IVF doctors were about that issue. They had some interesting rules about what they would and wouldn't tell the parents about the offspring options. I'd have to go ask my friends about it again for all of them, but I remember one of the rules was the doctors wouldn't tell them the color of the eyes before choosing.

[–] ickplant@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

I believe that ethical doctors do this. I also believe there are some unethical doctors out there who don’t give a shit and allow their patients to select for all kinds of traits. Ultimately, there is no way to know unless someone talks about it.

[–] IAMgROOT@lemmy.wtf 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] ickplant@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (2 children)

My first challenge to you would be to go look into the eyes of infertile people and tell them that “not everyone deserves a child, it’s not a right, it’s a gift.”

It’s easy to argue on the internet behind your keyboard. Much much harder to say your shitty beliefs out loud in front of people.

Here is my second question for you. A hypothetical.

You are at a fertility clinic, and a fire breaks out. You run past a room almost engulfed by flames, and see a little 4-year-old child in there, screaming for help.

As you go to rescue this child, you notice that the other side of the room has hundreds of embryos in Petri dishes. Babies, according to your beliefs.

You only have time to save one of those things. A 4-year-old child or hundreds of babies.

Who do you save? Be honest.

You'll never get a decent response from them

They're stupid, and deep in their cult

I think they just come here because they have a humiliation fetish

[–] IAMgROOT@lemmy.wtf 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)
  1. I could and would say "Hey, I don't think IVF is moral. I don't think murder is justifiable."

  2. I do not have time to save hundreds of petri dishes at once. IVF is also immoral as it creates so many human persons and only chooses one to live. I call the fire department after saving the child and pocketing as many petri dishes as I can

[–] ickplant@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)
  1. You could and would, but have you? I can assure you you’ve met many people who were conceived via IVF. Have you told them their parents are murderers to their face? Again, it’s super easy to hold these beliefs behind a keyboard.
  2. The hypothetical only allows you to save one of these things. The 4-year-old child or hundreds of embryos. Which do you save?
  3. I will say that I actually have more respect for anti-choice people when they are also anti-IVF. At least you’re consistent, so there’s that.
  4. What are your views on capital punishment? I hope they are consistent there too.
[–] IAMgROOT@lemmy.wtf 0 points 1 day ago
  1. I really haven't. No one walks around telling people how they were conceived

  2. If I only have two choices, I would choose the embryos, and keep them frozen until someone is ready to adopt them.

  3. thanks

  4. Capital Punishment and the overall construct of "punishment over rehabilitation" are bad.