this post was submitted on 27 Jul 2026
47 points (100.0% liked)

Television

2775 readers
262 users here now

Welcome to Television

This community is for discussion of anything related to television or streaming.

Other Communities

Television Communities

A community for discussion of anything related to Television via broadcast or streaming.

Rules:

  1. Be respectful and courteous to all members.
  2. Avoid offensive or discriminatory remarks.
  3. Avoid spamming or promoting unrelated products/services.
  4. Avoid personal attacks or engaging in heated arguments.
  5. Do not engage in any form of illegal activity or promote illegal content.
  6. Please mask any and all spoilers with spoiler tags.

Matrix Link

List of Best Rated TV Series as voted by the Fediverse

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] wjrii@lemmy.world 11 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

It's not because I'm obsessed with continuity, or because I'm a hardcore fan.... It requires more explanation than a soft reboot. Normally when you reboot something, you can tell it's a reboot.... But with Doctor Who, the fact it's a new actor doesn't tell you that at all, so most people casually watching would just be assuming, 'Oh, it's the next version of Doctor Who, he's changed again'... You'd have to keep reminding the audience, ‘We started from the beginning again.'

Completely fair for Doctor Who specifically, and as others have pointed out, utterly trivial to handwave things into however much of a reboot the new writers decide they want to do. Audiences of legacy SF properties will roll with whatever nonsense they need to if the resulting stories are compelling.

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 9 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

One thing that I appreciated about Doctor Who over the decades and also is why I'm not a big fan is how loose it is with lore and previous episodes. There's some continuity, but there's also a built in acceptance that things might change because of "reasons". Try that with Trek or Star Wars or lord help you Tolkien and the fans will kill you, but for Who fans they're always waving their hands around. It's about the atmosphere and campiness, not hard facts that would deter a story. I've always seen Doctor Who as like a collection of scifi short stories all sort of tied together but not needing to be.

Granted, I again am not a big fan, mostly watching the older stuff, so maybe that's not an accurate assessment now, but that was the "feel" I always got from it whenever I would catch an episode here and there. If Doctor Who had lyrics to the theme, it ought to be something similar to MST3K's "it's just a show".

[–] socsa@piefed.social 10 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

That's part of the fun though. It lets them do massive epic story arcs without needing to constantly be writing around those consequences later on. Especially with stories that are so nonlinear and time travel oriented, every tedious plot would basically hamstring every future plot, unless you are willing to play fast and loose with the lore. Then you can really get creative, while sticking to a handful of "fixed points" in the lore, which themselves can also be changed if the plot is sufficiently dramatic.

[–] Archer@lemmy.world 4 points 4 hours ago

If it’s a big enough problem, it gets eaten by the time pterodactyls. Easy peasy