this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2026
35 points (100.0% liked)
GenZedong
5269 readers
85 users here now
This is a Dengist community in favor of Bashar al-Assad with no information that can lead to the arrest of Hillary Clinton, our fellow liberal and queen. This community is not ironic. We are Marxists-Leninists.
See this GitHub page for a collection of sources about socialism, imperialism, and other relevant topics.
This community is for posts about Marxism and geopolitics (including shitposts to some extent). Serious posts can be posted here or in /c/GenZhou. Reactionary or ultra-leftist cringe posts belong in /c/shitreactionariessay or /c/shitultrassay respectively.
We have a Matrix homeserver and a Matrix space. See this thread for more information. If you believe the server may be down, check the status on status.elara.ws.
Rules:
- No bigotry, anti-communism, pro-imperialism or ultra-leftism (anti-AES)
- We support indigenous liberation as the primary contradiction in settler colonies like the US, Canada, Australia, New Zealand and Israel
- If you post an archived link (excluding archive.org), include the URL of the original article as well
- Unless it's an obvious shitpost, include relevant sources
- For articles behind paywalls, try to include the text in the post
- Mark all posts containing NSFW images as NSFW (including things like Nazi imagery)
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I was thinking about AI recently. It's really easy to imagine a dystopian future with Robocop-style bots and intense surveillance but I don't think it's gonna be so easy to ditch the proletariat as a class .
Like, robot cops (not necessarily humanoid) would need batteries in order to be mobile. They would need to recharge every so often and a battery would be a really weak spot.
I think physical labor is gonna be done by human hands for a long time. Intellectual labor might be easier to replace.
Just thinking statically, that's been the case a significant portion of the time. The whole thing about labor is it self-reproduces, self-maintains. That's part of the picture of capitalist value extraction. Put in liberal-friendly terms, the McDonalds worker goes home and tries to recuperate for free. The self-checkout kiosk, on the other hand, costs money to maintain.
Dynamically or dialectically, these tech advancements cause deterritorialization of social relations and class definitions. And it's difficult to predict how they'll be reterritorialized.
The gutting/proletarianization of the imperial "intellectual" class is gonna have some ripple effects that, to repeat myself for lack of creative vocabulary, are gonna be difficult to predict. The service class as a whole is hard to replace with tech, but it has developed in tandem with, to serve, the salary class that's currently being gutted. There's fewer Disney adults paying for their burger suburban utopia where they can yell at minimum wage workers. There's less and less money to recirculate within the service class.
More and more people fall out of the system (there's a compelling argument that this is one of the material drivers of prison systems). But I don't know what this growing class of people turns into once it reaches a critical mass. What percentage of a population can you sustainably imprison or execute?