World News
A community for discussing events around the World
Rules:
-
Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
-
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
-
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed.
-
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
-
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF OCTOBER 19 2025
-
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
-
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
-
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
Lemmy World Partners
News !news@lemmy.world
Politics !politics@lemmy.world
World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world
Ask Historians !askhistorians@lemmy.world
Recommendations
For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/
- Consider including the article’s mediabiasfactcheck.com/ link
view the rest of the comments
Carney: Tariffs will only hurt the American people... Same breath.. we will match the tariffs for Canadians dollar for dollar.
bullshit carney did not say tarrifs only hurt american people this is a lie and you are a liar for repeating a lie. liar.
I suppose you are right Only is a incorrect word to use.
Yeah, let's let the bully get their way, that'll only work out well for us.
Edit in case someone needs a meme to understand that eye for an eye doesn't apply to every situation evenly
If you are content to throw around pithy aphorisms in place of rational discussion, consider that an eye for an eye leaves the world blind.
You realize dollar for dollar doesn't mean retaliation with tariffs directly, right? There are other tools in the toolbox.
Bring on the export tariffs on potash and oil.
Uh huh. So I guess you have no idea what happens when you cowtow to a rapist country that is content to keep taking whatever it deems fit
You're a treacherous POS if you think whatever you said isn't completely stupid
Buddy, you are ALL up in your feels and not in control of yourself. You're not responding to what I wrote, you're responding to voices in your head. I was commenting on the quality of your argument, not on the underlying truth of the situation. The point being made is that any position can be justified when you use cliches instead of actual reasoning. For that you have to resort to childish name calling? Clearly you are not being a serious person right now. If you can pull yourself together, you're welcome to try again, but I have reported your abusive comment.
I'd also like to add that even if I was advocating for Canada to be annexed or some shit like that, your response would still be unacceptable. You don't get to abuse people because you don't respect their opinions. That's fucked up.
Welcome to Lemmy, where insults are thrown around freely and any comments encouraging constructive discourse is voted straight to the bottom of the thread.
We like to think that this forum is a place for intellectuals, but it's unfortunately just another mirror of society.
The statement about tarrifs hurting american people wasn't in the statement yesterday, but it has been said before. He doesn't mean they hurt US people solely, he means they bring no benefit to the american people.
So while it sucks for everyone, I think the point he's trying to make is to highlight that the canadian gov is using the retalitory tarrifs to mitigate the damage caused by US tarrifs, not just for punishment or to impose a tax on canadians. Perhaps important to note is that it's "dollar-for-dollar" not like-for-like, as to reduce impact on sensitive sectors.
Canadian EXPORT tariffs make even more Canadian products more expensive in the US, on items the US has no choice but to buy from Canada, like Potash and oil.
That's not a tariff, that's an excise tax.
I'm not following? Is this a correction or an addition to something in my comment?
Yeah, tariffs also hurt the importer. Hopefully they're going to target industries that Canadians are less reliant on / can easily substitute with domestic or allied nations' goods. The restrictions on US alcohol worked well for this.
There may also be some industries where, if you are reliant on America and you believe that's a problem in the long-term, then cutting that reliance down may justify the harm of the tariff.