this post was submitted on 22 Aug 2026
49 points (98.0% liked)

Linux

14763 readers
423 users here now

A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system (except the memes!)

Also, check out:

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

For people who already tried both, what's the reason you're sticking with GNOME or KDE as your desktop environment?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] banazir@lemmy.ml 4 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

When I got back to Linux some years back, I tried using GNOME because I had had good experiences with GNOME 2. Modern GNOME is awful, terribly opinionated and - in my view - has actual usability issues. Every interaction with the DE felt like pulling teeth and I didn't enjoy it one bit. GNOME Classic was better, but even that never felt quite right. At the time I wanted to use Wayland and therefore had limited options, so for the first time ever I tried Plasma, and I immediately found it to my liking. With only a few small cosmetic tweaks it felt like home. Things made sense to me and everything was where it should be - more or less; nothing's perfect. Since then I've looked at other options, but Plasma usually has one feature or another that alternative desktops lack or struggle with. So for now I'm sticking with Plasma, and I have no real reason to look elsewhere.

To be sure, I don't hate on anyone who prefers GNOME, it's just not my cup of tea. Not by a long shot. Use what works for your use case.

[โ€“] ajikeshi@lemmy.world 4 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

i am 100% with you!

Gnome 2... amazing for usability and customisability, and it came with sane defaults.

Gnome 3, weird change of how gnome works and feels, you cannot really customize the way you want, and it is more resource heavy.

which is why i am using Cinnamon or MATE nowadays