this post was submitted on 30 Aug 2026
147 points (98.0% liked)

Not The Onion

22511 readers
712 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, ableist, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] medicsofanarchy@lemmy.world 33 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

The FBI said the change was meant to account for the fact that some otherwise suitable candidates, including service members, may have engaged in the practice in places where it is legal and to accommodate applicants who may done so as a young child or have themselves been victims of sexual abuse.

So, "as a young child" if I used my allowance for sex instead of ice cream I would have been disqualified? Or if "as a young child" I was a victim of sexual abuse I would be disqualified? Because... reasons?

[–] MountingSuspicion@reddthat.com 11 points 3 weeks ago

It's possible the question was "have you ever been involved in an exchange of sexual acts for money?"

If you did survival sex work as a child (<18) or had a very awful life experience very young, you might still have to truthfully answer that question yes and that sucks. Of course I'm sure they care more about accepting people that did the purchasing than the providing, since the government is now filled with a people who pay for sex, but either way I'm glad there is a decrease in stigma for those affected.