I can be mad at both the exploitative structures and at the toolkits that enable, further and synthetize them. They don't need to be mutually exclusive, and in general it's not useful that they are.

[–] dubs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

So are you mad at power-tools? The internet? Cars? Because they are "building on the base of wage theft, human suffering, environmental destruction and empowerment of the oligarchies."

Why are you mad at one set of tools, but not the other sets of tools?

[–] lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Not really. What, you expect me to be mad at the wheelbarrow?

Geez, the low meda literacy and the silly arguments of absurdum from the people who try everything to sell a cage for which they don't have the keys is unprecedented.

[–] dubs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Then why are you mad at AI? Those fit all of the same requrirements that you listed above. Why do you think one is bad, but not the other?

[–] lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Do you really not understand concepts such as "necessary but not sufficient"? Just because I don't like strawberry juice doesn't mean I have to dislike all strawberries (or all juices).

Or are you trying to sell AIs for someone else?

Come on, be honest.

[–] dubs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 month ago

Can you at least try to answer my question?

You laid out a set of criteria: "...wage theft, human suffering, environmental destruction and empowerment of the oligarchies"

All of the examples I gave meet that criteria. Why is AI different?

Come on, be honest.