this post was submitted on 30 Aug 2026
682 points (98.6% liked)

Linux

14869 readers
185 users here now

A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system (except the memes!)

Also, check out:

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

yeah. using somebody else's LCA methodology doesn't make their methodology any good.

[–] rjwilliamson@lemmy.zip 1 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

It also doesn't make it bad, and you have yet to articulate how it is bad.

[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

you have yet to articulate how it is bad.

only if you're illiterate

[–] rjwilliamson@lemmy.zip 1 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

This you?

"i am more than willing to engage on any positive claim you want to make (i probably agree with a lot of them). what i’m not willing to do is tolerate personal attacks and dogpiling."

[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 11 hours ago (1 children)
[–] rjwilliamson@lemmy.zip 1 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Yet you have not given a single shred of evidence to back up the claims

[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

except all the evidence I have provided

[–] rjwilliamson@lemmy.zip 1 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

You have provided short, confidently incorrect statements with zero citations. I have provided multiple articles with multiple citations each. What "evidence" have you provided exactly?

[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 10 hours ago

saying they're incorrect doesn't make them so. i've also pointed out why your links aren't actually proof for your claims.

[–] rjwilliamson@lemmy.zip 1 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

It's really quite irrelevant to the overall point I was making, and was one of several studies that puts the estimate for animal agriculture between 10-20%. Anything else you would like to nitpick about that is irrelevant to the actual discussion?

[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

the study is not proof for its estimate. it's not good science.

[–] rjwilliamson@lemmy.zip 1 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

You are very good at saying things that have zero meaning.

[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 10 hours ago

what i said is true.