this post was submitted on 11 Sep 2026
51 points (87.0% liked)
Asklemmy
55528 readers
356 users here now
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
Search asklemmy ๐
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
- Lemmyverse: community search
- sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
- !lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~
founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
You could start by identifying the successful Marxist-Leninist country. I don't think there is one.
Cuba, China, Vietnam, and DPRK are all successful Marxist-Leninist countries.
DPRK? ๐คจ
especially DPRK https://dialecticaldispatches.substack.com/p/the-wsj-just-confirmed-what-socialists
The country that survived an American genocide and now is thriving? Yes.
Thriving? ๐คจ
Don't read the news much?
Cuba... If being able to withstand an embargo by the most powerful nation on Earth for decades and still managing to outperform them on healthcare, education and life expectancy is not "successful", I don't know what is...
lol, china is biggest world economy. the soviet took a famine ridden feudal country and turned it into a global power. meanwhile kkkanadians are clapping literal nazis in parliament. keep coping while your burger reich overlords annex your settler colony and you spend all of you wage on a 2m2 appartment.
I wish people like you cared enough to read more.
The USSR had pioneers in many fields, and was a global superpower.
If that means nothing to you then your opinion, alongside your brain-cell count, can be safely discarded.
piece of nazi useless trash, butthurt cracker westoid gringo you be coping hard af.
You should leave.
china was already mentioned
It's certainly a take anybody with even minimal understanding of what Marxism is would agree with.
calling china capitalist is another.
no it would not. it sounds to me you don't know what marxist principles are.
communism is the abolition of the state. socialism is the transition to a stateless society by using the bourgeois state against them and for the people.
marx himself (and later deng xiaoping, since the subject is the chinese state) believed capitalism and markets were necessary to develop productive forces before communism could happen.
please read marx before throwing names at people. this is the basics of marxism.
But when will the communism finally happen? I guess the people in power often fall into a conservative trap to keep the status quo because it's working.
After class struggle is done?
by lenin's logic, when the global capitalist hegemony is finally defeated. communism can't happen while capitalists would do everything to destroy it. it has to be an everyone wants it kind of thing.
this is also why you don't see country-sized anarchist societies and why we need socialism first.
So basically, we need to achieve world domination where most nations are governed by democratic socialists before we can defeat capitalism? That explains a lot.
Thank you for the explanation!
not at all. i'm not a social democrat, and "social democracy" is not what any of the AES countries are.
OK so capitalism and free markets are necessary. You need to have and dominate capitalism to end it. What's the intermediate governing principle? Communism? That's kind of a paradox, as we can't have communism within capitalism, or can we?
As I see it, China looks a lot like a one-party democratic socialist republic using capitalism to exert soft power. I might be wrong though.
Or are you talking about other countries which want to establish communism?
the intermediate governing principle is socialism. using it to keep the (global) rich down while we transition away from capitalism, into communism. though this is just the path china choose to walk: play along with global capitalism to develop their industry, yes.
though despite all that went wrong, lenin later showed us that you can indeed skip straight to socialism without capitalism or free markets and have it be even more advanced than what we have now in china.
a new communist revolution would look totally different in 2026, and would take a different character depending on which country it's happening on because it's more about people choosing their own path instead of having the empire dictate the washington consensus to them. this is the main thing but is what makes socialism the most difficult to understand by westerners who haven't lived imperialism.
yes they are. are you expecting the poorest country in the world to develop itself and solve all contradictions in a couple of decades?
i know real life socialism set literal records for developing quick but things still take time. rebuilding a country is not trivial.
please read the philosopher you are telling me you already like, and study more about the method he created.
I don't think westerners would want to live in a country like China. If that's the case, why don't people just immigrate there?
Because uprooting your life and moving to a different country is really hard to do as anybody with even a minimally functioning brain would understand?
"if your country is so bad why don't you move" sorta vibes
but to answer your question, westerners have no idea what china actually is.
We completely agree on that. Westerners cannot conceptualize what China is really like.
i hope you enjoy becoming the 51st state because brainworms this extensive can only lead to annexation by the us empire.